Public procurement constitutes a cornerstone of public financial management, representing a significant proportion
of government expenditure across developed and developing economies alike. Despite decades of regulatory reform, public
procurement systems continue to grapple with persistent challenges of corruption, inefficiency, limited competition, and
inadequate transparency. This paper presents a systematic review of procurement acts, examining their legal and regulatory
architecture, identifying critical gaps and inconsistencies, and analyzing the key issues and challenges that undermine
procurement effectiveness. Drawing on comparative analysis of procurement frameworks across multiple jurisdictions—
including the United States, United Kingdom, European Union, Canada, India, Australia, Kenya, Singapore, Nigeria, South
Africa, Brazil, and Ghana—this study synthesizes lessons from international best practices and high-profile procurement
failures. The paper proposes a comprehensive reform agenda encompassing enhanced transparency mechanisms, strengthened
oversight institutions, anti-corruption measures, e-procurement digitalization, performance-based contracting, and sustainable
procurement practices. The findings suggest that effective procurement reform requires simultaneous attention to legal
framework modernization, institutional capacity building, technological innovation, and stakeholder engagement. This paper
contributes to the public procurement literature by providing an integrative framework for procurement act review that links
regulatory analysis with practical reform implementation, offering actionable recommendations for policy makers, procurement
practitioners, and governance scholars.