Logo Lanfrica

Administrative Imperatives, Insecurity and Socio-Economic Development in Rivers State

Domain:

peace and securitysocioeconomic

Record type:

paper
Creator:
Sof
Publisher:
IIA
Host:
The study examined the relationship between administrative imperatives and insecurity in Rivers State, Nigeria, with a specific focus on six local government areas in the State between 2014 and 2024. The study interrogated how administrative capacity deficits, weak policy coordination, and ineffective grassroots governance structures contributed to the escalation and persistence of insecurity across the state. The study was anchored on Relative Deprivation Theory which provided an analytical framework for explaining insecurity as an outcome of unmet socio economic expectations, structural inequality, institutional neglect, and threats to human wellbeing beyond conventional state-centric security approaches. In methodological terms, the study adopted a survey research design complemented by qualitative techniques. A sample size of 400 respondents was scientifically determined using Taro Yamane’s formula. Primary data were generated through a structured questionnaire and Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) conducted across selected local government areas. Data analysis combined descriptive statistics such as mean and standard deviation with inferential analysis using the Pearson Product–Moment Correlation Coefficient, while qualitative data from FGDs were thematically analysed to enrich empirical interpretation. The findings demonstrated a statistically significant relationship between weak administrative performance at the local government level and the prevalence of insecurity in Rivers State. It recommended that local government councils in Ikwerre, Obio/Akpor, Eleme, Tai, Degema, and Akuku-Toru in particular and the state at large institutionalize inclusive and coordinated security governance frameworks. These should involve regular joint security meetings among the police, civil defence, local vigilante groups, traditional institutions, and relevant community stakeholders. The study argued that such an integrated, people-centred, and development-oriented administrative approach would enhance intelligence sharing, strengthen early-warning systems, and enable more effective responses to security threats.

Similar