Logo Lanfrica

Altimetric Rating Curves (ARCs) parameters from "Global Scale River Discharge and Mean Depth from Radar Altimetry and Model"

Domain:

environment and energygeospatial

Record type:

dataset
Creator:
ParGarGalCerbelaud, Arnaud
Publisher:
Zenodo
Host:avatar

Corresponding peer-reviewed publication

This dataset corresponds to the rating curves produced in the study reported in:

  • Paris, A., Garambois, P.-A., Gal, L., Cerbelaud, A., Larnier, K., David, C. H., Juca Oliveira, R. A., Wongchuig, S., Tourian, M.-J.  and Calmant, S. (202x), Global Scale River Discharge and Mean Depth from Radar Altimetry and Model.

When making use of any of the files in this dataset, please cite both the aforementioned article and this dataset. 

Dataset description

This dataset provides calibrated power-law rating curve parameters and associated discharge statistics at over 32,000 river virtual stations (VS) distributed across the globe. It is the primary output of a study combining nadir satellite altimetry water surface elevation (WSE) time series from the Hydroweb-Next database with a 30-year global monthly river discharge reanalysis (MeanDRS; Collins et al., 2024, Nature Geoscience), bias-corrected through long-term inverse routing at approximately 1,000 gauging stations worldwide.

Rating curves follow the power-law form  Q = a⋅(WSE - z₀)b where Q is river discharge (m³/s), WSE is the Water Surface Elevation (m), and a, b, z₀ are station-specific calibrated parameters.                                                                                    

Two calibration approaches are represented in the dataset: the Monthly Mean Rating Curve (MMRC), applied when WSE and discharge records overlap in time, and the Quantile-Quantile Rating Curve (QQRC), used in the majority of cases (~93%) where no temporal overlap exists.

Prior to calibration, anomalous hydroclimatic years were identified and removed using CHIRPS v2 precipitation data (1981–2009 reference period), reducing the influence of extreme ENSO-driven events on the fitted relationships. Parameter estimation was performed via Bayesian Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC), yielding both optimal values and uncertainty estimates (standard deviations) for each parameter.

Rating curves performance metrics (KGE, NSE, nRMSE, pBIAS) are computed by comparing rated discharge against the MeanDRS monthly climatic mean discharge used for calibration, and therefore reflect goodness of fit rather than independent validation accuracy. Independent validation strategy against in situ gauge networks is presented in the associated paper.

The effective mean river depth can be approximated at each station as  heq = Z̄(t) − z₀, where Z̄(t) is the long-term mean WSE. The global distribution of these depth estimates constitutes, to the authors' knowledge, the first near-global satellite-derived map of mean river depth.

The dataset covers the six continents and spans a wide range of river sizes and hydroclimatic regimes. Performance varies geographically, with generally stronger results in large to very large rivers (discharge > 100 m³/s) and in basins where the MeanDRS reanalysis has been bias-corrected. Lower scores are observed in arid or semi-arid regions, areas with strong human regulation of river flow (dams, diversions), and rivers with non-perennial flow regimes.

Files included in this version of the dataset

1. Rating curve parameters — ARCs_summary.csv

Semicolon-delimited text file. One row per virtual station.

ColumnUnitsDescription
basinBasin name
stationVirtual station identifier (reach name and river reach ID)
rividRiver reach identifier from MeanDRS / MERIT-Basins used for discharge calibration
lon°Longitude of the virtual station
lat°Latitude of the virstual station
aScaling coefficient of the power-law rating curve
bExponent of the power-law rating curve
z0mEffective cease-to-flow elevation (reference riverbed elevation)
a_sdPosterior standard deviation of a
b_sdPosterior standard deviation of b
z0_sdmPosterior standard deviation of z₀
zminmMinimum observed WSE in the altimetry time series
NSENash–Sutcliffe Efficiency
KGEKling–Gupta Efficiency
PBIAS%Percent bias between rated and modelled discharge
NRMSE%Normalized root mean square error
R2Coefficient of determination
approachCalibration method: quantile (QQRC) or monthlymean (MMRC)
first_dateUTCStart date of the WSE time series (YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM:SS)
last_dateUTCEnd date of the WSE time series (YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM:SS)
Q_meanm³/sMean discharge from MeanDRS
Q_medianm³/sMedian discharge from MeanDRS
Qminm³/sMinimum discharge from MeanDRS
Qmaxm³/sMaximum discharge from MeanDRS
Q_quantile25m³/s25th percentile discharge from MeanDRS
Q_quantile75m³/s75th percentile discharge from MeanDRS
missionAltimetry mission (e.g., J2, S3A, S6A)

Note: Performance metrics (KGE, NSE, NRMSE, PBIAS, R²) in this file are computed by comparing rated discharge against the MeanDRS monthly climatic mean discharge used for calibration. They reflect goodness of fit, not independent validation accuracy.

2. Independent validation statistics — validation_ARCs.csv

Semicolon-delimited text file providing independent validation of the rated discharge time series against in situ streamflow records from global and national gauge networks (GRDC, SCHAPI, and others). Each row corresponds to one virtual station–gauge pair. Validation is performed by comparing rated discharge against in situ monthly mean discharge computed over the overlapping observation period.

ColumnUnitsDescription
basinBasin name
stationVirtual station identifier
ProviderSource gauge network (e.g., GRDC, SCHAPI)
GaugeIDGauge identifier in the source network
lon°Longitude of the virtual station
lat°Latitude of the virtual station
R2Coefficient of determination
NSENash–Sutcliffe Efficiency
KGEKling–Gupta Efficiency
Pbias%Percent bias
NRMSE%Normalized root mean square error
obs_medianm³/sMedian observed discharge from in situ gauge
sim_medianm³/sMedian rated discharge from the rating curve
Classes_obsRiver size class based on observed discharge (e.g., S = small, M = medium, L = large)

Note: Unlike the calibration metrics, all scores here are computed by comparing rated discharge against in situ monthly mean discharge not used during calibration, and therefore constitute a true out-of-sample evaluation of rating curve performance.

 

3. Independent validation statistics (daily) — validation_ARCs_daily.csv

Semicolon-delimited text file providing independent validation of the rated discharge time series against in situ streamflow records from global and national gauge networks (GRDC, SCHAPI, and others). Each row corresponds to one virtual station–gauge pair. Validation is performed by comparing rated discharge against in situ monthly mean discharge computed over the overlapping observation period.

ColumnUnitsDescription
basinBasin name
stationVirtual station identifier
ProviderSource gauge network (e.g., GRDC, SCHAPI)
GaugeIDGauge identifier in the source network
lon°Longitude of the virtual station
lat°Latitude of the virtual station
R2Coefficient of determination
NSENash–Sutcliffe Efficiency
KGEKling–Gupta Efficiency
Pbias%Percent bias
NRMSE%Normalized root mean square error

Note: Unlike the calibration metrics, all scores here are computed by comparing rated discharge against in situ daily discharge not used during calibration, and therefore constitute a true out-of-sample evaluation of rating curve performance.

Languages

Similar