Abstract
Polygenic risk score (PRS) distributions vary across populations, complicating PRS risk assessment. We evaluated the impact of
post-hoc
PRS calibration according to individualized genetic ancestry estimates on PRS performance using two large multi-ethnic PRS for type 2 diabetes (T2D) (PRS
T2D
) and height (PRS
height
), in 8,841 African American (AA) individuals from the Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study. We calibrated each participant’s score as a function of estimated genetic similarity to the Yoruba (GSYRI) cohort in the 1000 Genomes Project. Uncalibrated PRSs were significantly skewed by GSYRI. After calibration, 33.6% of individuals in the top decile of PRS
T2D
were reclassified and performance in the top PRS
T2D
decile improved from an OR of 7.97 [6.31–10.13] to 10.77 [8.41– 13.91] when compared to the lowest decile. Similarly, 55.0% of individuals in the top PRS
height
decile were reclassified with GSYRI calibration. The calibrated PRS
height
showed higher correlation with height (from 0.24 to 0.32,
p
<10
−7
), and increased mean height in the top PRS
height
decile (
p
=5.7×10
−5
) when compared to the uncalibrated PRS
height
. Lastly, we show that evaluating uncalibrated PRS while adjusting for GSYRI in regression models can lead to inflated and unstable effect size estimates for both the PRS and GSYRI.