
E-learning adoption in African higher education cannot be explained through technical access or individual user willingness alone. This article synthesizes scholarship from the Liberian, West African, and broader African higher education literature to argue that digital adoption is shaped by a recursive interaction among infrastructural conditions, pedagogical cultures, institutional histories, and postcolonial power relations. Drawing on the thesis literature base and structured around five complementary theoretical frameworks, namely the Technology Acceptance Model, Hofstede's cultural dimensions, Cultural Lag Theory, Structuration Theory, and decolonial theory, the article demonstrates how these frameworks expose different but mutually reinforcing dimensions of the same problem. Infrastructure deficits, including high data costs, unreliable electricity, and limited device ownership, remain decisive material conditions, but they acquire amplified significance precisely because they interact with collectivist learning values, high power distance, oral pedagogical traditions, post-conflict institutional fragility, and concerns about epistemic dependency. The article shows that resistance to e-learning is frequently a rational, culturally grounded critique of platform mismatch rather than evidence of backwardness or technophobia. The persistence of WhatsApp as a learning environment, despite the availability of formal platforms, provides the clearest evidence that cultural alignment determines adoption outcomes more consistently than technical sophistication does. Seven analytical themes emerge from the synthesis: the social production of skepticism, communal epistemology versus platform individualism, oral tradition as a design criterion, teacher authority and legitimacy, post-conflict distrust and institutional fragility, gendered and generational exclusion, and the recursive interaction among these dimensions. The article concludes that sustainable digital transformation in African higher education requires culturally responsive pedagogy, mobile-first design, participatory platform governance, and a decolonial rethinking of what counts as appropriate digital education.