Forced displacement has reached historically unprecedented levels, with UNHCR reporting well over 100 million forcibly displaced people worldwide in recent years, a substantial proportion of whom are school-age children. National education systems in host countries face the dual challenge of expanding physical access to schooling for displaced learners while ensuring that access translates into meaningful, quality inclusion rather than parallel or marginal participation. This paper reviews the evolution of education policy responses to refugee and forced-displacement contexts, distinguishing between access-oriented policies (enrolment quotas, temporary learning spaces, catch-up programmes) and inclusion-oriented policies (curriculum adaptation, teacher training in psychosocial support, recognition of prior learning, and integration into national rather than parallel systems). Using a comparative policy-analysis approach informed by cases from Lebanon, Uganda, Turkey and Colombia, the paper argues that access-focused metrics commonly used to evaluate humanitarian education response, such as gross enrolment ratios, systematically overstate progress toward inclusion, masking persistent barriers related to language of instruction, certification recognition, and psychosocial wellbeing. The paper proposes a multidimensional framework for assessing displacement-responsive education policy and concludes with implications for donors, ministries of education and international agencies engaged in refugee education policy design.