Player-rating systems published under the FIFA and EA Sports FC franchises have become a standard shorthand for a footballer’s worth, and they are widely trusted as objective measurement. This article asks whether they describe players from the global periphery as bodies and players from the core as minds. Rather than treat the ratings as measurement, we treat them as an object of analysis, using the explicit line the system draws between cognitive and physical attributes. A panel of roughly 158,000 player-edition records across ten editions establishes the broad shape of the coding, and a behaviour-controlled sample of 1,385 player-tournament observations, built from event data for six international tournaments, holds constant what players did on the field. Net of overall ability, position, age, and measured behaviour, peripheral players are rated lower on cognitive attributes and higher on physical ones. The gap does not run through position, it survives within-position comparison, it has not narrowed in the latest edition, and it is steepest for Sub-Saharan African players. In the women’s game the African coding recurs while the broader economic gradient fades, which points to a racialized core beneath a world-systemic surface. We read the pattern as symbolic violence in algorithmic form.