Can multi-stakeholder forums influence good governance in communal forest management? Lessons from two case studies in Ethiopia
Domain:
environment and energyCreator:
M YJ.PA.M
Publisher:
Com
Host:
Following global trends, Multi-Stakeholder Forums (MSFs) have received attention as mechanisms for addressing deforestation and forest degradation in Ethiopia. However, little is understood on their influence on governance of forests. Based on qualitative research conducted in MSFs
organized at Bale and Jamma-Urji in Oromia, Ethiopia, this paper examines how MSFs may influence the governance of communal forests. Results indicate that the majority of informants believe that MSFs improve participation, facilitate collaboration across sectors, and have potential to address
power imbalances among stakeholders. Yet, failing to substantially engage the government in MSFs could either lower the success of the MSFs in bringing change in the governance of communal forests or limit the changes to the local community level. Embedding MSFs in government structures could
increase the enforcement of MSF outcomes and enable resource mobilization. However, caution is required to prevent the government's control over MSF processes and outcomes.
Similar
Lessons learnt from implementing the Good Governance for Medicines Programme in ZimbabwePRACTICES AND CHALLENGES OF GOOD GOVERNANCE IN URBAN LAND MANAGEMENT IN ADAMA TOWN, ETHIOPIACan Africa Diversify its Exports? Lessons from EthiopiaStrengthening Upstream Circular Economy Governance in Kenya: Policy Recommendations from a Multi-Stakeholder AssessmentImproving Governance of Tenure in Policy and Practice: A Conceptual Basis to Analyze Multi-Stakeholder Partnerships for Multi-Stakeholder Transformative Governance Illustrated with an Example from South AfricaParticipatory Forest Management as an adaptive strategy for sustainable forest governance in Gargeda State Forest, Ethiopia