(Ch)eating for oneself or cheating for others? Experimental evidence from young politicians and students in Kenya
Domain:
peace and securityRecord type:
dataset
Creator:
Lis
Publisher:
Cen
Host:
Honesty and orientation toward the common good are key qualities that people expect from their elected politicians. However, dishonesty in the forms of corruption, vote-buying and identity politics are not uncommon and can lead to a loss of trust in politics. This paper focuses on the cheating behavior of aspirant politicians and students in Kenya. I applied online coin flip experiments as means to detect cheating. In a between-subject design, participants could either (1) cheat to the benefit of a common good, (2) cheat to the benefit of their ethnic group, or (3) cheat to their own monetary advantage. On average, 38% of participants report the payoff-maximizing number of successful coin tosses with no difference between aspirant politicians and students. However, aspirant politicians report the payoff-maximizing outcome more readily than students when cheating benefits a common good. Perceiving corruption as justifiable is correlated with reporting higher numbers of successful coin tosses in the online experiment.
Similar
Replication Data for: "Why do voters support corrupt politicians? Experimental evidence from South Africa"Replication data for: Education, HIV, and Early Fertility: Experimental Evidence from KenyaData and Code for: Competition and Entry in Agricultural Markets: Experimental Evidence from KenyaReplication Data for: Electoral Administration in Fledgling Democracies: Experimental Evidence from KenyaUnhealthy eating practices of city-dwelling Africans in deprived neighbourhoods: Evidence for policy action from Ghana and KenyaEthnically Biased? Experimental Evidence from Kenya