Logo Lanfrica
  • Home
  • Atlas
  • Insights
  • Docs
  • Sign in

© 2026 Lanfrica. All rights reserved. All copyrights of the resources shown on the Lanfrica website belong to the original copyright holders, unless explicitly stated otherwise.

Claims Submitted to the Multilateral Development Bank Accountability Mechanisms – 1994-2025

Domain:

socioeconomic

Record type:

dataset
Creator:
Par
Publisher:
The
Host:avatar
The dataset represents a summary depiction of grievance cases brought to the Accountability Mechanisms (AMs) of the seven Multilateral Development Banks (MDBs) from 1994 to 2024. These are: the African Development Bank, the Asian Development Bank, the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank, the Inter-American Development Bank, the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, the World Bank (International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/International Development Association) and the International Finance Corporation and Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency (together comprising the World Bank Group) . Version 7 of the database is notable for the addition of the Asian Investment Infrastructure Bank. The Accountability Mechanisms were created to enable people adversely or potentially adversely affected by a project or program financed by the MDBs to take their concerns to the Banks for recourse. The Accountability Mechanisms generally do not stop the project or provide material reparations. They seek to stop or prevent harm and mitigate the negative aspects of a development project. The objective of the database is to be able to garner a quick qualitative snapshot of any given case, as well as to be able to aggregate quantitative data for each AM as a whole and to identify trends over time. Each of the grievance mechanisms has a specific name, which may have changed over time. It may also be comprised of more than one office with separate functions (i.e. consulting with affected people versus a compliance investigation). Most of the Accountability Mechanisms now have separate functions, with the consultation process also called problem solving. The compliance phase is to investigate whether the MDBs have complied with their environmental and social policies and whether this has led to harm. The Accountability Mechanisms are detailed below. Version 7 of the database is also notable for aligning the World Bank with the format of the other Accountability Mechanisms. The dataset includes cases received by the AMs from the beginning of each mechanism until 19th of September 2025. The last update for cases is 19th September 2025.

Visit

doi.orgses.library.usyd.edu.au

Licenses

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Internationalhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode

Similar

‘Minilateral’ Development Banks: What the Rise of Africa's Trade and Development Bank says about Multilateral GovernanceMeasuring ability to assess claims about treatment effects: the development of the ‘Claim Evaluation Tools’2017 Joint Report on Multilateral Development Banks' Climate FinanceCorporate Governance in the South African Public Agencies: Implications for Oversight and Accountability MechanismsAccountability Complexities in Non-governmental Organisation: A Reflection of Practical Mechanisms for Instilling Accountability in Selected Tanzania's Non-governmental OrganisationsData set submitted for the Article entitled "The Governance of Employment Formalization: Unpacking the Mechanisms of Regulatory Reform on Labor Markets in Africa"

‘Minilateral’ Development Banks: What the Rise of Africa's Trade and Development Bank says about Multilateral Governance

ABSTRACT Multilateral development banks (MDBs) are one of the most popular forms of international o

Measuring ability to assess claims about treatment effects: the development of the ‘Claim Evaluation Tools’

Objectives To describe the development of the Claim Evaluation Tools, a set of

2017 Joint Report on Multilateral Development Banks' Climate Finance

The Joint Report on Multilateral Development Banks’ Climate Finance is an annual collaborative effor

Corporate Governance in the South African Public Agencies: Implications for Oversight and Accountability Mechanisms

Government oversight mechanisms are imperative to sustain state-owned enterprises (SOEs) in an emerg

Accountability Complexities in Non-governmental Organisation: A Reflection of Practical Mechanisms for Instilling Accountability in Selected Tanzania's Non-governmental Organisations

Non-governmental Organisations are key development partners who receive funds and other support from

Data set submitted for the Article entitled "The Governance of Employment Formalization: Unpacking the Mechanisms of Regulatory Reform on Labor Markets in Africa"

This dataset contains a consolidated macro-panel of 54 African countries spanning 2011 to20