Closing the gaps in experimental and observational crop response estimates: a bayesian approach
Domain:
agricultureRecord type:
paper
Creator:
MaxTerPhi
Publisher:
Oxf
Host:
Abstract
A stylized fact of African agriculture is that crop responses to inorganic fertilizer application derived from experimental studies are often substantially greater than those from observational studies (e.g. surveys and administrative data). Recent debates on relative costs and benefits of expensive farm input subsidy programs in Africa, have raised the importance of reconciling these estimates. Beyond mean response differences, this paper argues for including parameter uncertainty and heterogeneity arising from variations in soil types, environmental conditions, and management practices. We use a Bayesian approach that combines information from experimental and observational data to model uncertainty and heterogeneity in crop yield responses. Using nationally representative experimental, survey, and administrative datasets from Malawi, we find that: (1) crop responses are low in observational data, (2) there are large spatial heterogeneities, and (3) based on sensitivity analysis, ignoring parameter uncertainty and spatial heterogeneity in crop responses can lead to questionable policy prescriptions.
Similar
A Bayesian approach to produce 100 m gridded population estimates using census microdata and recent building footprints.Fungal diseases in Africa: Closing the gaps in diagnosis and treatment through implementation research and advocacyClosing the Digital Divide in Low-Income Urban Communities: A Domestication ApproachClosing staffing gaps in Madagascar's protected areas to achieve the 30 by 30 conservation targetClosing the gaps: workflows to improve alien species lists and streamline the process from detection to actionSharpening the Axe: Identifying and Closing Gaps Within the Training Space of the South African Private Security Industry