Logo Lanfrica
  • Home
  • Atlas
  • Insights
  • Docs
  • Sign in

© 2026 Lanfrica. All rights reserved. All copyrights of the resources shown on the Lanfrica website belong to the original copyright holders, unless explicitly stated otherwise.

Comparative Performance of Zero-Shot Synthetic Error Data and Human Annotations on Low-Resource Languages in FLORES-200

Domain:

natural language processing

Record type:

paper
Creator:
Ass
Publisher:
Zenodo
Host:avatar
Grammatical Error Detection (GED) methods rely heavily on human annotated error corpora. However, these annotations are unavailable in many low-resource languages. In this paper, we investigate GED in this context. Leveraging the zero-shot cross-lingual transfer capabilities of multilingual pre-trained language models, we train a model using data from a diverse set of languages to generate synthetic errors in other languages. These synthetic error corpora are then used to train a GED model. Specifically we propose a two-stage fine-tuning pipeline where the GED model is first fine-tuned on mult Research goal: How does the performance of synthetic error data generated via zero-shot cross-lingual transfer compare to human-annotated data when evaluated on low-resource languages using the FLORES-200 benchmark? Autonomous synthesis report generated by Assignee Research. Tribunal consensus score: 9.3/10. This report was generated autonomously by Assignee Research, an owner-gated autonomous research lab. The content synthesizes findings from peer-reviewed papers. Tribunal score: 9.3/10.

Visit

doi.orgzenodo.org

Tasks

grammar error correctiontransfer learning

Tags

performancesyntheticerrordatageneratedzero-shotcross-lingualtransfer

Licenses

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Internationalhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode

Similar

Grammatical Error Detection Performance in Low-Resource Languages: Zero-Shot Synthetic vs. Human-Annotated BaselinesScaling Zero-Shot Cross-Lingual Transfer for Synthetic Error Data Generation in Low-Resource LanguagesDiversity in Zero-Shot Synthetic Data for Low-Resource Grammatical Error DetectionZero-shot Cross-lingual Transfer Performance of mT5 and Bloom in Synthetic Error Generation for Low-resource LanguagesPerformance comparison of synthetic error data via zero-shot cross-lingual transfer and human-annotated data on CoNLL-14 benchmarkMultilingual Intermediate-Task Training for Low-Resource Languages on FLORES-200

Grammatical Error Detection Performance in Low-Resource Languages: Zero-Shot Synthetic vs. Human-Annotated Baselines

Grammatical Error Detection (GED) methods rely heavily on human annotated error corpora. However, th

Scaling Zero-Shot Cross-Lingual Transfer for Synthetic Error Data Generation in Low-Resource Languages

Grammatical Error Detection (GED) methods rely heavily on human annotated error corpora. However, th

Diversity in Zero-Shot Synthetic Data for Low-Resource Grammatical Error Detection

Grammatical Error Detection (GED) methods rely heavily on human annotated error corpora. However, th

Zero-shot Cross-lingual Transfer Performance of mT5 and Bloom in Synthetic Error Generation for Low-resource Languages

Grammatical Error Detection (GED) methods rely heavily on human annotated error corpora. However, th

Performance comparison of synthetic error data via zero-shot cross-lingual transfer and human-annotated data on CoNLL-14 benchmark

Grammatical Error Detection (GED) methods rely heavily on human annotated error corpora. However, th

Multilingual Intermediate-Task Training for Low-Resource Languages on FLORES-200

Intermediate-task training---fine-tuning a pretrained model on an intermediate task before fine-tuni