Logo Lanfrica
  • Home
  • Atlas
  • Insights
  • Docs
  • Sign in

© 2026 Lanfrica. All rights reserved. All copyrights of the resources shown on the Lanfrica website belong to the original copyright holders, unless explicitly stated otherwise.

Comparison of XLM-R and mBERT in Multilingual Euphemism Detection Performance

Domain:

natural language processing

Record type:

paper
Creator:
Ass
Publisher:
Zenodo
Host:avatar
Euphemisms are culturally variable and often ambiguous, posing challenges for language models, especially in low-resource settings. This paper investigates how cross-lingual transfer via sequential fine-tuning affects euphemism detection across five languages: English, Spanish, Chinese, Turkish, and Yoruba. We compare sequential fine-tuning with monolingual and simultaneous fine-tuning using XLM-R and mBERT, analyzing how performance is shaped by language pairings, typological features, and pretraining coverage. Results show that sequential fine-tuning with a high-resource L1 improves L2 perfo Research goal: How does the performance of XLM-R and mBERT compare in simultaneous multilingual fine-tuning for euphemism detection across high-resource and low-resource languages, as measured by F1-score and cross-lingual transfer consistency? Autonomous synthesis report generated by Assignee Research. Tribunal consensus score: 8.7/10. This report was generated autonomously by Assignee Research, an owner-gated autonomous research lab. The content synthesizes findings from peer-reviewed papers. Tribunal score: 8.7/10.

Visit

doi.orgzenodo.org

Tasks

text classificationtransfer learning

Languages

Yoruba

Tags

performanceXLM-RmBERTsimultaneousmultilingualfine-tuningeuphemismdetection

Licenses

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Internationalhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode

Similar

Trade-offs in Cross-lingual Euphemism Detection: XLM-R vs. mBERT with Sequential and Simultaneous Fine-tuningPerformance Gap in Cross-Lingual Euphemism Detection with Scaled XLM-R ModelsImpact of Simultaneous Multilingual Fine-Tuning on XLM-R Precision in Low-Resource Euphemism DetectionCross-lingual Euphemism Detection Performance of XLM-R-Large vs. Larger Models on XTREME-R BenchmarkmBERT Performance Variability in Euphemism Detection Across Language PairingsPerformance Comparison of XLM-R and mBERT on XTREME-R with Sequential vs. Simultaneous Fine-Tuning for Morphologically Complex

Trade-offs in Cross-lingual Euphemism Detection: XLM-R vs. mBERT with Sequential and Simultaneous Fine-tuning

Euphemisms are culturally variable and often ambiguous, posing challenges for language models, espec

Performance Gap in Cross-Lingual Euphemism Detection with Scaled XLM-R Models

Euphemisms are culturally variable and often ambiguous, posing challenges for language models, espec

Impact of Simultaneous Multilingual Fine-Tuning on XLM-R Precision in Low-Resource Euphemism Detection

Euphemisms are culturally variable and often ambiguous, posing challenges for language models, espec

Cross-lingual Euphemism Detection Performance of XLM-R-Large vs. Larger Models on XTREME-R Benchmark

Euphemisms are culturally variable and often ambiguous, posing challenges for language models, espec

mBERT Performance Variability in Euphemism Detection Across Language Pairings

Euphemisms are culturally variable and often ambiguous, posing challenges for language models, espec

Performance Comparison of XLM-R and mBERT on XTREME-R with Sequential vs. Simultaneous Fine-Tuning for Morphologically Complex

Euphemisms are culturally variable and often ambiguous, posing challenges for language models, espec