Logo Lanfrica
  • Home
  • Atlas
  • Insights
  • Docs
  • Sign in

© 2026 Lanfrica. All rights reserved. All copyrights of the resources shown on the Lanfrica website belong to the original copyright holders, unless explicitly stated otherwise.

Computational Efficiency of Sequential vs. Simultaneous Fine-Tuning for Cross-Lingual Euphemism Detection on XTREME-R

Domain:

natural language processing

Record type:

paper
Creator:
Ass
Publisher:
Zenodo
Host:avatar
Euphemisms are culturally variable and often ambiguous, posing challenges for language models, especially in low-resource settings. This paper investigates how cross-lingual transfer via sequential fine-tuning affects euphemism detection across five languages: English, Spanish, Chinese, Turkish, and Yoruba. We compare sequential fine-tuning with monolingual and simultaneous fine-tuning using XLM-R and mBERT, analyzing how performance is shaped by language pairings, typological features, and pretraining coverage. Results show that sequential fine-tuning with a high-resource L1 improves L2 perfo Research goal: How does the computational efficiency (inference time and memory usage) of sequential fine-tuning compare to simultaneous fine-tuning for cross-lingual euphemism detection on XTREME-R when scaling to larger language sets? Autonomous synthesis report generated by Assignee Research. Tribunal consensus score: 8.8/10. This report was generated autonomously by Assignee Research, an owner-gated autonomous research lab. The content synthesizes findings from peer-reviewed papers. Tribunal score: 8.8/10.

Visit

doi.org

Tasks

text classificationtransfer learning

Languages

Yoruba

Tags

computationalefficiencyinferencetimememoryusagesequentialfine-tuning

Licenses

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Internationalhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode

Similar

Cross-lingual euphemism detection inference efficiency in XLM-R-Large with sequential vs. simultaneous fine-tuningCross-lingual Euphemism Detection Performance in XLM-R-Large: Sequential vs. Simultaneous Fine-tuningComparative Analysis of Simultaneous vs. Sequential Fine-Tuning in Cross-Lingual Euphemism DetectionTrade-offs in Cross-lingual Euphemism Detection: XLM-R vs. mBERT with Sequential and Simultaneous Fine-tuningScaling Batch Size in Sequential vs. Simultaneous Fine-Tuning of XLM-R-Large for Cross-Lingual Euphemism Detection Bias AlignmentCross-lingual Euphemism Detection Accuracy in Sequential XLM-R-Large Fine-tuning

Cross-lingual euphemism detection inference efficiency in XLM-R-Large with sequential vs. simultaneous fine-tuning

Euphemisms are culturally variable and often ambiguous, posing challenges for language models, espec

Cross-lingual Euphemism Detection Performance in XLM-R-Large: Sequential vs. Simultaneous Fine-tuning

Euphemisms are culturally variable and often ambiguous, posing challenges for language models, espec

Comparative Analysis of Simultaneous vs. Sequential Fine-Tuning in Cross-Lingual Euphemism Detection

Euphemisms are culturally variable and often ambiguous, posing challenges for language models, espec

Trade-offs in Cross-lingual Euphemism Detection: XLM-R vs. mBERT with Sequential and Simultaneous Fine-tuning

Euphemisms are culturally variable and often ambiguous, posing challenges for language models, espec

Scaling Batch Size in Sequential vs. Simultaneous Fine-Tuning of XLM-R-Large for Cross-Lingual Euphemism Detection Bias Alignment

Euphemisms are culturally variable and often ambiguous, posing challenges for language models, espec

Cross-lingual Euphemism Detection Accuracy in Sequential XLM-R-Large Fine-tuning

Euphemisms are culturally variable and often ambiguous, posing challenges for language models, espec