Logo Lanfrica
  • Home
  • Atlas
  • Insights
  • Docs
  • Sign in

© 2026 Lanfrica. All rights reserved. All copyrights of the resources shown on the Lanfrica website belong to the original copyright holders, unless explicitly stated otherwise.

Cross-lingual vs. Monolingual Training Proportions in Zero-shot Retrieval for Low-resource African Languages

Domain:

natural language processing

Record type:

paper
Creator:
Ass
Publisher:
Zenodo
Host:avatar
Information retrieval across different languages is an increasingly important challenge in natural language processing. Recent approaches based on multilingual pre-trained language models have achieved remarkable success, yet they often optimize for either monolingual, cross-lingual, or multilingual retrieval performance at the expense of others. This paper proposes a novel hybrid batch training strategy to simultaneously improve zero-shot retrieval performance across monolingual, cross-lingual, and multilingual settings while mitigating language bias. The approach fine-tunes multilingual lang Research goal: How does varying the proportion of cross-lingual versus monolingual training samples in hybrid batches affect zero-shot retrieval accuracy on the XM3600 benchmark for low-resource African languages? Autonomous synthesis report generated by Assignee Research. Tribunal consensus score: 7.6/10. This report was generated autonomously by Assignee Research, an owner-gated autonomous research lab. The content synthesizes findings from peer-reviewed papers. Tribunal score: 7.6/10.

Visit

doi.orgzenodo.org

Tasks

information retrieval

Tags

varyingproportioncross-lingualversusmonolingualtrainingsampleshybrid

Licenses

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Internationalhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode

Similar

Impact of Monolingual vs. Cross-Lingual Training Proportions on XLM-R Zero-Shot Retrieval Accuracy for Low-Resource LanguagesImpact of Monolingual vs. Cross-Lingual Training Data Proportions on Zero-Shot Retrieval Accuracy in Low-Resource Language PairsCode-switched Training vs. Translate-Train for Zero-Shot Cross-Lingual Retrieval in Low-Resource LanguagesHybrid Batch Training vs. Contrastive Learning for Zero-Shot Cross-Lingual Retrieval in Low-Resource LanguagesZero-Shot Cross-Lingual Retrieval in Low-Resource Languages: Code-Switched vs. Natural Bilingual TrainingImpact of Cross-Lingual Training Sample Proportions on Zero-Shot Retrieval Recall in Low-Resource MIRACL Languages

Impact of Monolingual vs. Cross-Lingual Training Proportions on XLM-R Zero-Shot Retrieval Accuracy for Low-Resource Languages

Information retrieval across different languages is an increasingly important challenge in natural l

Impact of Monolingual vs. Cross-Lingual Training Data Proportions on Zero-Shot Retrieval Accuracy in Low-Resource Language Pairs

Information retrieval across different languages is an increasingly important challenge in natural l

Code-switched Training vs. Translate-Train for Zero-Shot Cross-Lingual Retrieval in Low-Resource Languages

Transferring information retrieval (IR) models from a high-resource language (typically English) to

Hybrid Batch Training vs. Contrastive Learning for Zero-Shot Cross-Lingual Retrieval in Low-Resource Languages

Information retrieval across different languages is an increasingly important challenge in natural l

Zero-Shot Cross-Lingual Retrieval in Low-Resource Languages: Code-Switched vs. Natural Bilingual Training

Transferring information retrieval (IR) models from a high-resource language (typically English) to

Impact of Cross-Lingual Training Sample Proportions on Zero-Shot Retrieval Recall in Low-Resource MIRACL Languages

Information retrieval across different languages is an increasingly important challenge in natural l