Logo Lanfrica
  • Home
  • Atlas
  • Insights
  • Docs
  • Sign in

© 2026 Lanfrica. All rights reserved. All copyrights of the resources shown on the Lanfrica website belong to the original copyright holders, unless explicitly stated otherwise.

Data-Self-Check: A framework for automated Data Quality Assessment of Malaria routine surveillance data designed for DHIS2 using Machine Learning techniques

Domain:

healthcare

Record type:

paper
Creator:
AshJulBarWis
Publisher:
Res
Host:
Abstract Background The extraction of valuable insights from malaria routine surveillance data is highly dependent on the processes and tools used to collect, curate, store, analyse, and disseminate that data and the essential information obtained from it. The main challenge is to ensure good quality of data collected at the local level. In this work, we have proposed a new framework for Data Quality Assessment designed for DHIS2 using Machine Learning techniques. Methodology The data used in this study was extracted from the DHIS2 Platform for 8 districts of Mopti in Mali for 2016 and 2017. We carried out three data preprocessing tasks. We developed four models based on machine learning algorithms for local and global outlier detection, trained and validated on malaria surveillance routine data extracted from DHIS2. We used five main evaluation metrics to assess the performance of the developed models. The proposed framework's design will consider the steps of Report-Accuracy Assessment and Cross-Checks presented in the Malaria Routine Data Quality Assessment Tool (MRDQA Tool). Results For the case of random errors (outliers), we found that all four models did not reach an AUC value of 60%. Despite the low value of the AUC metric, the precision scores reached values more than 90%. As the AUC metric represents the overall performance of the models, we can say that random errors do not leave enough patterns in the malaria routine surveillance data to be detected. In contrast, detecting systematic errors has good value for performance metrics (87% AUC and 98% precision. This is the case for systematic errors with the same structures (same consecutive months and same columns) in two different districts and systematic errors with different structures at the same time period in two differents districts. Conclusion The machine learning models integrated into the proposed framework perform well in detecting random and systematic errors (global or local outliers) in the malaria routine surveillance data. Only consistent and accurate data will be stored in the DHIS system with the proposed framework. This will maximise the potential to extract actionable knowledge from malaria routine surveillance data to make better informed-decision.

Visit

doi.org

Licenses

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/