How do voters' election day experiences and post-election events and elite cues interact to generate a voter's beliefs about the quality, integrity, and trustworthiness of an election? Existing work examines the effects of election day experiences and elite cues. We argue that these sources of information may interact. We test these ideas via a two-stage conjoint experiment in which respondents from the U.S., Kenya, Nigeria, and Malawi form initial beliefs about election quality and integrity based on randomized election day conditions. Then, respondents update those beliefs using information from elite cues and other common post-election events.