Figure 5 in Naming South African frogs and reptiles in nine Indigenous languages

Domain:

natural language processingenvironment and energy

Record type:

paper

Creator:

PhaHugRav

Publisher:

Host:

Figure 5: Taxonomic rank comparability between South African herptile scientific taxa and folk taxa recorded from published literature and a questionnaire. 5a) Percentage of folk taxa comparable with scientific taxa for frogs. 5b) Percentage of folk taxa comparable with scientific taxa for reptiles. Published as part of Phaka, Fortunate M, Hugé, Jean, Ravhuanzwo, Fortune, Vanhove, Maarten Pm & Preez, Louis H du, 2025, Naming South African frogs and reptiles in nine Indigenous languages, pp. 87-104 in African Journal of Herpetology 74 (1) on page 96, DOI: 10.1080/21564574.2024.2441663, zenodo.org

Visit

doi.org zenodo.org

Licenses

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode

Figure 1 in Naming South African frogs and reptiles in nine Indigenous languages

Figure 1: Process of compiling a comprehensive list of Indigenous language names for herptiles. Publ

Figure 4 in Naming South African frogs and reptiles in nine Indigenous languages

Figure 4: Correspondence of collected Indigenous language names with scientific names of South Afric

Figure 3 in Naming South African frogs and reptiles in nine Indigenous languages

Figure 3: Correspondence of collected Indigenous language names with scientific names of South Afric

Figure 2 in Naming South African frogs and reptiles in nine Indigenous languages

Figure 2: English version of a multilingual online questionnaire used to document folk taxonomy of S

Naming South African frogs and reptiles in nine Indigenous languages

Scientific taxonomy, as a standardised means of communicating about wildlife, might have limited