fizzlee998/SDG-Community-Outreach-Impact-Analysis

A data analytics project evaluating the impact of SDG outreach programs in Ilorin, Nigeria. # 🌍 SDG Community Outreach Impact Analysis ### 🧠 Project Overview This project analyzes how **community outreach and educational programs** have contributed to awareness and behavioral change toward achieving the **Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)**. The goal was to evaluate **participant engagement, awareness improvement, and project impact** using data analytics and predictive modeling. The project demonstrates how evidence-based analysis can guide better decision-making for sustainable development programs. --- ## 📘 Dataset Description The dataset, `sdg_outreach_data.csv`, contains **2,000 records** of participants from different communities who attended SDG sensitization and training programs. | Column | Description | |---------|-------------| | `Participant_ID` | Unique identifier for each participant | | `Age` | Participant’s age (18–60 years) | | `Gender` | Male or Female | | `Community` | Community name (e.g., Tanke, Akata, Oyun) | | `SDG_Focus` | Focus area such as SDG 3 (Health), SDG 4 (Education), etc. | | `Sessions_Attended` | Number of sessions each participant attended | | `Awareness_Before` | Awareness score before the outreach (0–100 scale) | | `Awareness_After` | Awareness score after the outreach | | `Satisfaction_Level` | Rating of program satisfaction (1–5 scale) | | `Project_Impact_Score` | Computed measure of participant outcome and program success | > 🗂️ Synthetic data was generated using Python and Faker to simulate realistic outreach program data. --- ## 📊 Key Visuals ### 1️⃣ Gender Distribution ### 2️⃣ SDG Focus Participation ### 3️⃣ Correlation Heatmap > Visuals generated using **Matplotlib** and **Seaborn** during exploratory data analysis. --- ## 📈 Analysis Results - **Awareness Growth:** Participants demonstrated an average **awareness improvement of 37%** after attending outreach sessions. - **Satisfaction:** The average satisfaction level was **4.1 out of 5**, indicating high participant engagement. - **Impact S …