Focusing on the constitution of cybersecurity as a problem space, this
study applies empirical data to test social and political theories against
cybersecurity discourses and practices. In particular, those of developed
states security apparatuses. It employs data to analyse the relationship
between poorer developing states and their wealthier developed
counterparts in the context of development (digital divide, capacity
building and other efforts designed to respond to such divide), and the
challenges of cybersecurity. To do this, the problematisation of
cybersecurity is explored through an examination of the role of the United
Kingdom (UK) and other Western states and institutions. This role is
interrogated within projects delivered through initiatives such as the
Commonwealth Cybercrime Initiatives (CCI), and other similar initiatives,
delivered by such bodies as the Commonwealth Telecommunication Union
(CTU), the International Telecommunication Union (ITU), the UK’s Foreign
and Commonwealth Office (FCO), the European Union Agency for Cybersecurity
(ENISA), amongst others. The delivery of such projects in three developing
Commonwealth states of Ghana, Botswana and Trinidad and Tobago are case
studied. Data is collected and analysed against theoretical concepts of
modernisation, dependency and governmentality, to understand the
relationship between security, law, language or discourse and development.
The aim is to provide new insights into forms of ‘governing’ that exist
through such practices, and their impact on the development of social,
political and legal frameworks in such weaker economies. Thus, the study
synthesises the question of how these security discourses and practices
shape the formation of certain knowledge as “truth”, and allow continued
dependence of the less resourced developing states on such knowledge. In
doing so, it tracks the objectives and effects of power to reveal certain
knowledges, techniques or strategies which render cybersecurity
intelligible, and normalises its perception as a legitimate problem for
global policy and legal concern.