Logo Lanfrica
  • Home
  • Atlas
  • Insights
  • Docs
  • Sign in

© 2026 Lanfrica. All rights reserved. All copyrights of the resources shown on the Lanfrica website belong to the original copyright holders, unless explicitly stated otherwise.

How does the integration of visual context (emoji/image embeddings) into XLM-R-Base affect cross-lingual euphemism detection

Domain:

natural language processing

Record type:

paper
Creator:
Ass
Publisher:
Zenodo
Host:avatar
Euphemisms are culturally variable and often ambiguous, posing challenges for language models, especially in low-resource settings. This paper investigates how cross-lingual transfer via sequential fine-tuning affects euphemism detection across five languages: English, Spanish, Chinese, Turkish, and Yoruba. We compare sequential fine-tuning with monolingual and simultaneous fine-tuning using XLM-R and mBERT, analyzing how performance is shaped by language pairings, typological features, and pretraining coverage. Results show that sequential fine-tuning with a high-resource L1 improves L2 perfo Research goal: How does the integration of visual context (emoji/image embeddings) into XLM-R-Base affect cross-lingual euphemism detection performance on XTREME-R, particularly when fine-tuned on high-resource languages (English, Spanish) and evaluated on Yoruba, as measured by F1 score improvements compared to text-only fine-tuning? Autonomous synthesis report generated by Assignee Research. Tribunal consensus score: 7.5/10. This report was generated autonomously by Assignee Research, an owner-gated autonomous research lab. The content synthesizes findings from peer-reviewed papers. Tribunal score: 7.5/10.

Visit

doi.org

Tasks

text classificationtransfer learning

Languages

Yoruba

Tags

integrationvisualcontextemojiimageembeddingsXLM-R-Baseaffect

Licenses

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Internationalhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode

Similar

Intermediate Language Fine-Tuning for Cross-Lingual Euphemism Detection in XLM-RPerformance Gap in Cross-Lingual Euphemism Detection with Scaled XLM-R ModelsCross-lingual Euphemism Detection Accuracy in Sequential XLM-R-Large Fine-tuningCross-lingual Euphemism Detection Performance of XLM-R-Large vs. Larger Models on XTREME-R BenchmarkCross-lingual Euphemism Detection Performance in XLM-R-Large: Sequential vs. Simultaneous Fine-tuningXLM-R Performance Enhancement via Intermediate Task Fine-Tuning for Cross-Lingual Euphemism Detection

Intermediate Language Fine-Tuning for Cross-Lingual Euphemism Detection in XLM-R

Euphemisms are culturally variable and often ambiguous, posing challenges for language models, espec

Performance Gap in Cross-Lingual Euphemism Detection with Scaled XLM-R Models

Euphemisms are culturally variable and often ambiguous, posing challenges for language models, espec

Cross-lingual Euphemism Detection Accuracy in Sequential XLM-R-Large Fine-tuning

Euphemisms are culturally variable and often ambiguous, posing challenges for language models, espec

Cross-lingual Euphemism Detection Performance of XLM-R-Large vs. Larger Models on XTREME-R Benchmark

Euphemisms are culturally variable and often ambiguous, posing challenges for language models, espec

Cross-lingual Euphemism Detection Performance in XLM-R-Large: Sequential vs. Simultaneous Fine-tuning

Euphemisms are culturally variable and often ambiguous, posing challenges for language models, espec

XLM-R Performance Enhancement via Intermediate Task Fine-Tuning for Cross-Lingual Euphemism Detection

Euphemisms are culturally variable and often ambiguous, posing challenges for language models, espec