Logo Lanfrica
  • Home
  • Atlas
  • Insights
  • Docs
  • Sign in

© 2026 Lanfrica. All rights reserved. All copyrights of the resources shown on the Lanfrica website belong to the original copyright holders, unless explicitly stated otherwise.

Input Utilization and Agricultural Productivity: Panel Evidence from Tanzania, Kenya, Uganda, and Rwanda

Domain:

agriculture

Record type:

paper
Creator:
IdrHasEdw
Publisher:
Hel
Host:
Agriculture is central to livelihoods in East Africa, employing nearly 60% of the labor force, yet productivity growth has remained modest. This study examines the determinants of agricultural productivity in Tanzania, Kenya, Uganda, and Rwanda between 2000 and 2023. Using panel data from the World Development Indicators and a fixed effects regression framework, agricultural value added per worker is modeled as a function of fertilizer consumption, arable land use, rural population share, and GDP growth. Diagnostic tests confirmed no multicollinearity, while het-eroskedasticity and autocorrelation were detected and corrected with clustered standard errors. Panel unit root tests revealed mixed integration orders, with fertilizer consumption stationary af-ter first differencing. Robustness checks, including specifications with lagged fertilizer consump-tion, robust standard errors, and random effects, demonstrated coefficient stability, and residual cross section dependence tests indicated independence across countries. Results show that ferti-lizer consumption (β = 0.1085, p < 0.01), arable land use (β = 0.7648, p < 0.01), and rural popula-tion share (β = 1.4112, p < 0.01) significantly enhance productivity, while GDP growth is statisti-cally insignificant (β = 0.0013, p > 0.05). These findings suggest that productivity improvements in East Africa are driven primarily by input intensification and labor utilization rather than macroeco-nomic expansion. The study concludes that policies expanding fertilizer access, promoting sus-tainable land management, and enhancing rural labor efficiency are essential to support agricul-tural transformation and strengthen food security

Visit

doi.org

Similar

Electricity Access and Agricultural Productivity in Sub-Saharan Africa: Evidence from Panel DataMobile Money, Agricultural Intensification, and Household Welfare: Panel Evidence from Rural UgandaHealth and Productivity: Panel Data Evidence from EthiopiaCan agricultural subsidies reduce gendered productivity gaps? Panel data evidence from ZambiaThe impact of smart input subsidy program on farm productivity: Evidence from TanzaniaVariability in agricultural productivity and rural household consumption inequality: Evidence from Nigeria and Uganda

Electricity Access and Agricultural Productivity in Sub-Saharan Africa: Evidence from Panel Data

Mobile Money, Agricultural Intensification, and Household Welfare: Panel Evidence from Rural Uganda

Abstract We examine the impact of the rapidly expanding mobile banking service “mobile money” on ru

Health and Productivity: Panel Data Evidence from Ethiopia

Abstract :  Neoclassical growth models and endogenous growth theories show the positive contributio

Can agricultural subsidies reduce gendered productivity gaps? Panel data evidence from Zambia

Abstract Motivation Farmer input support programmes (FISPs) have been implemented in sub‐Saharan

The impact of smart input subsidy program on farm productivity: Evidence from Tanzania

Variability in agricultural productivity and rural household consumption inequality: Evidence from Nigeria and Uganda

Abstract This paper uses multiple rounds of panel data to assess the distributional implications of