Logo Lanfrica
  • Home
  • Atlas
  • Insights
  • Docs
  • Sign in

© 2026 Lanfrica. All rights reserved. All copyrights of the resources shown on the Lanfrica website belong to the original copyright holders, unless explicitly stated otherwise.

Layer-wise adaptation with typological features vs. adapter-based fine-tuning for cross-lingual euphemism detection

Domain:

natural language processing

Record type:

paper
Creator:
Ass
Publisher:
Zenodo
Host:avatar
Euphemisms are culturally variable and often ambiguous, posing challenges for language models, especially in low-resource settings. This paper investigates how cross-lingual transfer via sequential fine-tuning affects euphemism detection across five languages: English, Spanish, Chinese, Turkish, and Yoruba. We compare sequential fine-tuning with monolingual and simultaneous fine-tuning using XLM-R and mBERT, analyzing how performance is shaped by language pairings, typological features, and pretraining coverage. Results show that sequential fine-tuning with a high-resource L1 improves L2 perfo Research goal: How does the layer-wise adaptation strategy with typological features in XLM-R-Large compare to adapter-based fine-tuning (e.g., P-adapters, T-adapters) in terms of accuracy and inference efficiency for cross-lingual euphemism detection across high- and low-resource languages? Autonomous synthesis report generated by Assignee Research. Tribunal consensus score: 8.8/10. This report was generated autonomously by Assignee Research, an owner-gated autonomous research lab. The content synthesizes findings from peer-reviewed papers. Tribunal score: 8.8/10.

Visit

doi.org

Tasks

text classificationtransfer learning

Languages

Yoruba

Tags

layer-wiseadaptationstrategytypologicalfeaturesXLM-R-Largeadapter-basedfine-tuning

Licenses

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Internationalhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode

Similar

Typological Similarity and Fine-Tuning Strategies in Cross-Lingual Euphemism DetectionSequential Fine-Tuning with XLM-R for Cross-Lingual Euphemism Detection Across Varying Typological DistancesComparative Analysis of Simultaneous vs. Sequential Fine-Tuning in Cross-Lingual Euphemism DetectionIntermediate Task Fine-Tuning for Cross-Lingual Euphemism Detection EfficiencyCross-lingual euphemism detection inference efficiency in XLM-R-Large with sequential vs. simultaneous fine-tuningCross-lingual Euphemism Detection Performance in XLM-R-Large: Sequential vs. Simultaneous Fine-tuning

Typological Similarity and Fine-Tuning Strategies in Cross-Lingual Euphemism Detection

Euphemisms are culturally variable and often ambiguous, posing challenges for language models, espec

Sequential Fine-Tuning with XLM-R for Cross-Lingual Euphemism Detection Across Varying Typological Distances

Euphemisms are culturally variable and often ambiguous, posing challenges for language models, espec

Comparative Analysis of Simultaneous vs. Sequential Fine-Tuning in Cross-Lingual Euphemism Detection

Euphemisms are culturally variable and often ambiguous, posing challenges for language models, espec

Intermediate Task Fine-Tuning for Cross-Lingual Euphemism Detection Efficiency

Euphemisms are culturally variable and often ambiguous, posing challenges for language models, espec

Cross-lingual euphemism detection inference efficiency in XLM-R-Large with sequential vs. simultaneous fine-tuning

Euphemisms are culturally variable and often ambiguous, posing challenges for language models, espec

Cross-lingual Euphemism Detection Performance in XLM-R-Large: Sequential vs. Simultaneous Fine-tuning

Euphemisms are culturally variable and often ambiguous, posing challenges for language models, espec