Oil curse, State instability and violence in developing countries : theoretical lessons for Nigeria
Domain:
peace and securitysocioeconomicRecord type:
paper
Creator:
Per
Editor:
Uni
Publisher:
CCSD
Host:
Oil production in Nigeria is often believed to bring economic failure, political instability, the inability to democratise, high levels of corruption, and violence in the form of rising crime, interstate wars, and internal conflicts. Such an assumption is quite prevalent amongst aid practitioners, journalists, activists, and some academics. Yet there are many exceptions in developing countries, and this paper empirically criticizes the 'resource curse' theory by focusing on the relationship between oil-producing states and war. It first examines contradictions and correlations that do not demonstrate causality. To escape economic determinism, it then suggests paying more attention to political contexts and historical timeframes, especially when authoritarian regimes existed before oil production. Sometimes, the oil rent can indeed exacerbate conflicts. But it is never a single cause. A quick reading of averages and correlations can be misleading in this regard. The conclusion thus calls for further qualitative investigation.
Similar
Youth Unemployment and Political Instability in Nigeria: Electoral Violence, Government Legitimacy, and Lessons for Emerging EconomiesSalam As Banking Financing for Agriculture in Developing Countries: Lessons From SudanProgressive Royalty Framework for Oil and Gas Development Strategy: Lessons from NigeriaThe broiler chicken production value chain in Nigeria between needs and policy: situation analysis, action plan for development, and lessons for other developing countriesGROWTH AND POLITICAL INSTABILITY: A THEORETICAL APPROACH WITH MACRO-DYNAMIC SIMULATIONMarital Instability And Depression Among Public Servants In Cross River State, Nigeria