Logo Lanfrica
  • Home
  • Atlas
  • Insights
  • Docs
  • Sign in

© 2026 Lanfrica. All rights reserved. All copyrights of the resources shown on the Lanfrica website belong to the original copyright holders, unless explicitly stated otherwise.

Peer support for people with severe mental illness versus usual care: study protocol for a pragmatic multicentre randomised controlled trial (UPSIDES-RCT)

Domain:

healthcare
Creator:
GalJasAnnRei
Publisher:
Spr
Host:
Abstract Background: Peer support is an established intervention involving a person in recovery from mental illness being engaged to offering support to others with mental illness. Peers are an under-used resource in global mental health. Building upon comprehensive formative research, this study will rigorously evaluate the impact of peer support at the levels of service users (psychosocial and clinical outcomes), peer support workers (work role, empowerment), services (cost-effectiveness, return on investment), and implementation (adoption, sustainability, organisational change). Methods: UPSIDES-RCT is a pragmatic parallel-group multi-centre randomised controlled trial assessing the effectiveness of UPSIDES at four measurement points over one year (baseline, 4-, 8-, and 12-month follow-up), and embedded process evaluation and cost-effectiveness analysis. Research will take place in a range of high-, middle- and low-income countries (Germany, United Kingdom, Israel, Uganda, Tanzania, India). The primary outcome is social inclusion of service users with severe mental illness (N= 558; N = 93 per site) at 8-month follow-up, measured with the Social Inclusion Scale. Secondary outcomes include empowerment (Empowerment Scale), hope (HOPE scale), recovery (Stages of Recovery), and health and social functioning (Health of the Nations Outcome Scales). Mixed-methods process evaluation will investigate mediators and moderators of effect, and implementation experiences of four UPSIDES stakeholder groups (service users, peer support workers, mental health workers, and policy makers). A cost-effectiveness analysis examining cost-utility and health budget impact will estimate the value for money of UPSIDES peer support. Discussion: By implementing and evaluating a manualized peer support intervention for people with severe mental illness across low-, middle-, and high-income countries, this study will contribute to harmonising core elements of peer support across different cultural and organisational dimensions. The UPSIDES-RCT will explore the essential components necessary to create a peer support model in mental health care, while providing the evidence required to sustain and eventually scale-up the intervention. Performance of mental health services will be maximised by actively involving and empowering service users, generating system changes towards user-centeredness, recovery orientation, community participation, and realising mental health as a human right. Trail registration: ISRCTN, ISRCTN26008944. Registered 30 October 2019, isrctn.com.

Visit

doi.org

Licenses

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Similar

Mobile messaging support versus usual care for people with type 2 diabetes in sub-Saharan Africa: a protocol for a multicentre randomized controlled trial (StAR2D) (Preprint)Mobile messaging support versus usual care for people with type 2 diabetes on clycemic control: Protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trialEnhanced versus standard outpatient care of asthmatic children in Malawi: study protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trialFamily-based intervention for prevention and self-management of disabilities due to leprosy, podoconiosis and lymphatic filariasis versus usual care in Ethiopia: study protocol for a cluster-randomised controlled trialAdditional file 2 of Measuring fidelity to manualised peer support for people with severe mental health conditions: development and psychometric evaluation of the UPSIDES fidelity scaleRifapentine and isoniazid for prevention of tuberculosis in people with diabetes (PROTID): protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Mobile messaging support versus usual care for people with type 2 diabetes in sub-Saharan Africa: a protocol for a multicentre randomized controlled trial (StAR2D) (Preprint)

UNSTRUCTURED Background: Health outcomes for people treated for type 2 dia

Mobile messaging support versus usual care for people with type 2 diabetes on clycemic control: Protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial

Background: Health outcomes for people treated for type 2 diabetes could be subs

Enhanced versus standard outpatient care of asthmatic children in Malawi: study protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial

Abstract Background Asthma is the most com

Family-based intervention for prevention and self-management of disabilities due to leprosy, podoconiosis and lymphatic filariasis versus usual care in Ethiopia: study protocol for a cluster-randomised controlled trial

Introduction Leprosy, podoconiosis and lymphatic filariasis (LF) are three ski

Additional file 2 of Measuring fidelity to manualised peer support for people with severe mental health conditions: development and psychometric evaluation of the UPSIDES fidelity scale

Additional file 2_final UPSIDES fidelity scale SU and PSW version.pdf Contains the final UPSIDES fid

Rifapentine and isoniazid for prevention of tuberculosis in people with diabetes (PROTID): protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Abstract Background Diabetes mellitus (DM) increases the risk o