Overfishing and environmental change are squeezing the fisheries of the Gulf of Guinea, and the people who depend on them, harder every year. This study asks a practical question: can data streaming off marine sensors be turned into forecasts good enough to actually guide management decisions? Drawing on sixty months of in-situ and satellite-derived observations (sea-surface temperature, salinity, chlorophyll-a, dissolved oxygen and turbidity) collected across the coastal waters of Nigeria, Ghana and Côte d'Ivoire, we built and compared four predictive models for catch-per-unit-effort (CPUE): support vector regression, random forest, gradient-boosted trees (XGBoost) and a long short-term memory (LSTM) neural network. The LSTM came out ahead (R² = 0.91, RMSE = 1.62 tonnes), with XGBoost close behind and far cheaper to train. Chlorophyll-a concentration and sea-surface temperature dominated the feature-importance rankings, which lines up with what marine ecologists would expect about primary productivity driving fish abundance. We argue that these models are accurate enough to support near-real-time, adaptive management, and we set out what it would take to deploy them responsibly in a data-scarce, multi-jurisdiction setting