Replication Data for: The Economic Foundations of Powersharing: Evidence from Africa

How—and with whom—do rulers share power? Existing research focuses on the strategic logic of powersharing. In this paper we analyze its economic foundations. Powersharing is modeled as a subnational fiscal contract, in which rulers allocate political representation based on constituencies' revenue potential. Empirically, we combine historical geospatial data on different types of primary commodity production —mineral point resources and diffuse smallholder cash crop agriculture—with the ethnic affiliation of cabinet ministers across 15 countries in Africa. We find that cash crop groups are overrepresented in post-independence cabinets, while mining or food crop production does not translate into higher shares of power. Consistent with a revenue bargaining framework, we find that rulers traded political representation and targeted public services for higher rates of indirect taxation of cash crops. Overall, this suggests powersharing can serve not only as a means to distribute resources and coopt potential challengers, but also to expand the pie and the rents at the ruler’s disposal. This dataset underwent an independent verification process, complying with the AJPS Verification Policy updated June 2023, which replicated the tables and figures in the primary article. For the supplementary materials, verification was performed solely for the successful execution of the code. The verification process was carried out by the Cornell Center for Social Sciences at Cornell University.
The associated article has been awarded the Open Materials Badge. Learn more about the Open Practice Badges from the Center for Open Science.

Open Materials Badge