Logo Lanfrica
  • Home
  • Atlas
  • Insights
  • Docs
  • Sign in

© 2026 Lanfrica. All rights reserved. All copyrights of the resources shown on the Lanfrica website belong to the original copyright holders, unless explicitly stated otherwise.

Risk-Sharing Tests and Covariate Shocks: Drought, Floods, and Pests in Uganda

Domain:

socioeconomic

Record type:

paper
Creator:
Eth
Publisher:
Ame
Host:
Efficient risk sharing implies a simple factor structure for marginal utilities of expenditure (MUEs): Pareto weights divided by a common price. The standard approach infers MUEs from total expenditures, implicitly assuming homothetic preferences, unitary income elasticities, and identical price elasticities. Risk-sharing tests using total expenditures work for idiosyncratic shocks (budgets change, but not prices), but not “covariate” shocks (prices change). I describe all preferences that permit one to infer MUEs from expenditures and estimate nonhomothetic MUEs to test whether covariate shocks are shared efficiently in Uganda. This delivers sensible results; the standard approach suggests that droughts, floods, and pests are beneficial. (JEL D12, D81, O12, O13, Q12)

Visit

doi.org

Similar

Data and Code: "Risk sharing tests and covariate shocks"

Data and Code: "Risk sharing tests and covariate shocks"

Full risk-sharing implies that marginal utilities of expenditure (MUEs) have a simple factor structu