Objectives: The research aims to analyze the methodology of inference in artificial intelligence models and compare it with the curriculum of Islamic fundamentalist schools, and to study the possibility of integration between computer reasoning and jurisprudence. It also seeks to assess the ability of artificial intelligence algorithms to accommodate fundamental rules and legitimate purposes, Propose a methodological framework for employing artificial intelligence techniques in supporting jurisprudence, while maintaining Sharia and ethical standards.
Methodology: The research relied on an inductive analytical methodology, as reasoning methodologies in Islamic fundamentalist schools and reasoning mechanisms in artificial intelligence were analyzed separately. The general rules and models extracted from legal texts and modern applications were extrapolated with the aim of providing an integrated understanding of the aspects of Similarities and differences between the two approaches, while proposing practical frameworks commensurate with the purposes of Sharia.
Results: The research found a similarity between the methodology of inference in the principles of Islamic jurisprudence and artificial intelligence algorithms, especially in the use of measurement and induction. But it also showed fundamental differences, as the principles of jurisprudence rely on legal texts and human ijtihad, while adopting models Artificial intelligence on programming and text inputs, which limits its ability to understand legitimate intents. The research also showed the possibility of integration between artificial intelligence models and jurisprudence, with the need for human monitoring to ensure that Sharia purposes are observed.
Conclusion: The research provides an important scientific addition in the field of modern Islamic studies, as it combines the Islamic jurisprudential heritage with modern reasoning methodologies represented in artificial intelligence. AI can support jurisprudence by analyzing data and making recommendations, but it cannot replace ijtihad Human for detracting from the understanding of legitimate purposes and moral values. The employment of artificial intelligence in the fields of Sharia must be balanced, so as to enhance facilitation and remove embarrassment without prejudice to the principles and constants of Sharia.