This reflective practice piece examines how developers of curriculum and textbooks can navigate ideological pressure when a ruling authority’s agenda is in tension with constitutional or universal human values, particularly regarding the representation of minorities. Drawing on four decades of experience across Asian and African contexts, the author outlines a three-phase strategy for exercising ‘generative power’ rather than confronting authority directly. This involves negotiating a pre-writing phase to establish a shared vision and agreed beliefs about children and learning; using experiential, participatory processes so teams internalise inclusive values through their own reasoning rather than imposed argument; and building rigorous, fast-moving development frameworks that leave little space for later ideological interference. The paper concludes that facilitators rarely hold coercive power over decision-makers, but can protect children's interests by cultivating trust, ownership, and quality that authorities are reluctant to overturn.