Logo Lanfrica
  • Home
  • Atlas
  • Insights
  • Docs
  • Sign in

© 2026 Lanfrica. All rights reserved. All copyrights of the resources shown on the Lanfrica website belong to the original copyright holders, unless explicitly stated otherwise.

Women and Apartheid

Record type:

paper
Creator:
Meg
Publisher:
Oxford University PressNew York, NY
Host:
Abstract Apartheid, the system of racial and ethnic separation introduced in South Africa in 1948, was a gendered project. The immediate goal of the white Afrikaner men who led the apartheid state was to control black men: to turn black men from perceived political and criminal threats into compliant workers. Under apartheid, African men would travel to work for whites in towns and on mines, but their homes would be in rural ethnic “reserves,” known as “homelands” or “Bantustans.” This vision depended on the labors of African women: while their men migrated to work, women were to maintain their families in the increasingly overcrowded and desolate countryside, reproducing the workforce cheaply while instilling a sense of ethnic difference in their children. “Coloured” (mixed-race) and Indian women were similarly charged with social reproduction on a shoestring, in segregated rural and urban areas. White women uniquely had the franchise and freedom of movement, but they were also constrained by sexually repressive laws. Apartheid’s gendered vision of production and social reproduction faced continual resistance, and it ultimately failed. First, it failed because African women increasingly moved from rural areas to urban centers, despite laws limiting their mobility. Second, it failed because some women organized across ethnic and racial lines. They often organized as mothers, demanding a better world for a new generation. Both their nationally and internationally resonant campaigns—against pass laws, educational and health care inequities, police brutality, and military conscription—and the fact of their collective organization gradually undermined apartheid. Officials generally underestimated the power of women, and their contributions have continued to be under-appreciated since apartheid ended in 1994, because women’s political style emphasized personal and familial concerns. But because apartheid was premised on transforming how families lived, actions of women in fact undermined the system from its core.

Visit

doi.org

Similar

The Position of Women in Selected Post-apartheid IsiZulu PlaysMigration, Remittances, and Educational Stratification among Blacks in Apartheid and Post-Apartheid South AfricaHumanities After ApartheidManoeuvring the Closet and Re-closeting: Negotiating Freedom, Agency, and Safety amongst Black African Queer Women in Post-Apartheid South AfricaEntrenching Apartheid Football and Failed Sports DiplomacyApartheid and Urban Segregation Levels in South Africa

The Position of Women in Selected Post-apartheid IsiZulu Plays

Migration, Remittances, and Educational Stratification among Blacks in Apartheid and Post-Apartheid South Africa

This paper extends previous work on family structure and children’s education by conceptualizing mig

Humanities After Apartheid

Since independence, African scholars from different traditions (African, Islamic and Western), intel

Manoeuvring the Closet and Re-closeting: Negotiating Freedom, Agency, and Safety amongst Black African Queer Women in Post-Apartheid South Africa

This article explores the complex negotiations surrounding identity, visibility, and safety amongst

Entrenching Apartheid Football and Failed Sports Diplomacy

Apartheid policy and practices permeated all aspects of social life in South Africa from 1948 onward

Apartheid and Urban Segregation Levels in South Africa

The policy of apartheid, or racial separation, in South Africa has been one of the most controversia