The rapid advancement of Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) has transformed global library service paradigms, driving law libraries to transition from traditional print collections to digitally enabled environments. Despite this shift, judicial law libraries in developing nations often face structural and institutional constraints that impede digital service delivery. This study assessed the availability, utilization, user satisfaction, challenges, and optimization strategies relating to electronic library services in the Law Library of the State High Court of Justice, Kogi State, Nigeria. The study adopted a convergent parallel mixed-methods research design. Quantitative data were gathered via total enumeration census targeting 35 institutional stakeholders, resulting in 27 fully completed and retrieved structured questionnaires (a 77.1% response rate). Qualitative data were captured via semi-structured key informant interviews conducted with a purposively sampled cohort of 10 professionals (4 High Court judges, 4 professional librarians, and 2 court clerks) to triangulate and deepen the statistical insights. Quantitative instruments demonstrated strong internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.85) and were analyzed via descriptive statistics (mean scores [X ̅] and standard deviations [SD]), while qualitative data underwent thematic analysis. The quantitative findings revealed that while basic electronic services, digital law reviews, and electronic legal forms were technically available and moderately utilized, the adoption of advanced electronic legal resources remained constrained by systemic challenges. Qualitative narratives confirmed that unstable internet connectivity, prohibitive database subscription costs, a deficit in localized Nigerian electronic content, and low digital literacy among senior legal practitioners severely limited the library's digital performance. User satisfaction was moderate, with participants expressing greater satisfaction with human library staff support than with the underlying technological infrastructure. The study concludes that while digital transformation initiatives have commenced, significant systemic barriers restrict optimal utilization. Recommendations include increased budgetary allocation for dedicated broadband systems, sustainable funding for commercial legal databases (e.g., LawPavilion, LexisNexis), continuous hands-on digital literacy training for legal professionals, and the implementation of an institutional judicial ICT policy.