Abstract
This paper investigates how systematically a young macro-community sign language, Kenyan Sign Language, uses two
different means to communicate about events: (i) word order, and (ii) verb agreement using spatial co-reference. The study finds
that KSL signers rely primarily on word order and using the body as a referent, rather than verb agreement, when representing
transitive events. Yet, by looking separately at how KSL signers use the sub-components of verb agreement, a pattern emerges that
indicates a possible path toward ‘canonical verb agreement’. These sub-components are evaluated using Meir’s stages/types of
grammaticalization of verb agreement ( Meir 2011 , 2016 ), and compared with other young and emerging sign languages.