The role of policymakers’ capacity in determining the right policy direction cannot be
overemphasized. In recent times, the use of computer-aided tools innovates and smartly enhances
policymakers’ operational capacity. This study assesses key policymakers’ knowledge/perception,
capacity for optimizing computer-aided approaches in facilitating evidence-informed policymaking
in Ebonyi State Nigeria. This cross-sectional study used structured questionnaire of 5-point likert
scale among key health policymakers/stakeholders in the health sector in Ebonyi State. The study
had fifty (50) participants who were key stakeholders in the health sector sampled at the technical
meetings of the Advocacy Working Group (AWG) of Health Policy Plus (HP+) in Ebonyi State. Data
was collected using the questionnaire and analyzed in a table of descriptive statistics using IBM
SPSS version 20 software. Findings from the research recorded fair knowledge/perception of basic
computing techniques/approaches with average mean rating MNR (3.69), and for policymaking
ideals MNR (3.74) less evidence use dynamics MNR (2.87). Capacity for optimizing computer-aided
approaches returned a very weak average MNR (2.99), desire/willingness to adopt emerging
computing technique in evidence-informed policymaking MNR (4.40). Policymaking perspectives
average MNR (3.66). The study findings indicated fair knowledge index, very weak capacity for
optimizing computer-aided approaches, but with a high desire both to adopt and uptake it in
advancing EIP in the health sector. The study recommends comprehensively articulated strategic
capacity enhancement training intervention for key policymakers on this subject.
Keywords: Computer-Aided, Synthesize, Evidence-Informed, Pretest, Optimize, Policy, Health
Journal Reference Format:
Igboji, Kingsley O., Uneke, Jesse C., Uneke, Chika T. Otubo & Ogbaga, Ignatius N*. (2024): Assessing Health Policymakers’ Knowledge
and Capacity for Optimizing Computer-Aided Approaches in Evidence-Informed Policymaking. Journal of Behavioural Informatics, Digital
Humanities and Development Rese Vol. 10 No. 4. Pp 49-62.
isteams.net
dx.doi.org/