Logo Lanfrica
  • Accueil
  • Atlas
  • Analyses
  • Documentation
  • Sign in

© 2026 Lanfrica. Tous droits réservés. Tous les droits d'auteur des ressources affichées sur le site Web Lanfrica appartiennent aux détenteurs de droits d'auteur d'origine, sauf indication contraire explicite.

Auditing African Content Moderators' Working Conditions by Using the European General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)

Domaine:

socioeconomicdigital infrastructure

Type de record:

paper
Créateur:
TigPidKgoMal
Hôte:avatar
In this article, we audit the working conditions of content moderators in Kenya and Nigeria employed by business process outsourcing (BPO) companies by using the European General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). We demonstrate its extraterritorial scope for gaining access to elements such as employment contracts and NDAs that have never been provided to the workers concerned. The results of this approach provide legally grounded evidence of the structural disadvantages faced by content moderators in the Global South, whose exploitative working conditions violate workers' rights. Our work also highlights the benefits of legislation aimed at protecting individuals' data rights as a counterweight to the tech industry's discourse of exceptionalism, which obscures its dependence on BPOs to externalise labour costs and accountability, whilst claiming that its products, business models, and methods of resource extraction are unprecedented and fall outside any existing legal framework. ACM FAccT 2026 accepted paper

Visit

arxiv.org

Tags

Computers and SocietyHuman-Computer Interaction

Similaires

The regulation of artificial intelligence through data protection laws: Insights from South AfricaBeyond Content Exposure: Systemic Factors Driving Moderators' Mental Health Crisis in AfricaFAIR, GDPR and Qualitative Data: Respecting personal data vs respectable researchAuditing YouTube Content Moderation in Low Resource Language SettingsMeeting The Standard: an Overview of European Biobank Regulation and a Comparison to the Current South African PositionDigitalisation in science and technology policy: engagement, alignment, and misalignment between the European Union and South African data protection and privacy frameworks

The regulation of artificial intelligence through data protection laws: Insights from South Africa

Beyond Content Exposure: Systemic Factors Driving Moderators' Mental Health Crisis in Africa

Content moderators review disturbing content to protect social media users, often at significant cos

FAIR, GDPR and Qualitative Data: Respecting personal data vs respectable research

All research data should be FAIR and as open as possible. However, qualitative research data (includ

Auditing YouTube Content Moderation in Low Resource Language Settings

While there has been increasing attention paid to the potential harms perpetuated by online platform

Meeting The Standard: an Overview of European Biobank Regulation and a Comparison to the Current South African Position

Digitalisation in science and technology policy: engagement, alignment, and misalignment between the European Union and South African data protection and privacy frameworks

Science policy and technology policy have historically been characterised by international collabora