Comparative Analysis of BERT and GPT for Classifying Crisis News with Sudan Conflict as an Example

To obtain actionable information for humanitarian and other emergency responses, an accurate classification of news or events is critical. Daily news and social media are hard to classify based on conveyed information, especially when multiple categories of information are embedded. This research used large language models (LLMs) and traditional transformer-based models, such as BERT, to classify news and social media events using the example of the Sudan Conflict. A systematic evaluation framework was introduced to test GPT models using Zero-Shot prompting, Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), and RAG with In-Context Learning (ICL) against standard and hyperparameter-tuned bert-based and bert-large models. BERT outperformed GPT in F1-score and accuracy for multi-label classification (MLC) while GPT outperformed BERT in accuracy for Single-Label classification from Multi-Label Ground Truth (SL-MLG). The results illustrate that a larger model size improves classification accuracy for both BERT and GPT, while BERT benefits from hyperparameter tuning and GPT benefits from its enhanced contextual comprehension capabilities. By addressing challenges such as overlapping semantic categories, task-specific adaptation, and a limited dataset, this study provides a deeper understanding of LLMs’ applicability in constrained, real-world scenarios, particularly in highlighting the potential for integrating NLP with other applications such as GIS in future conflict analyses.