This study focused a comparative analysis of item characteristics of 2017 to 2021 NECO
Technical Drawing multiple-choice questions (MCQs) in the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja,
Nigeria. Four research objectives, research questions, and hypotheses guided the study. Data
were obtained from NECO headquarters in Minna, Niger State. The population of the study
comprised 6,258 candidates who registered and sat for the NECO Technical Drawing
examination across 177 secondary schools in the Federal Capital Territory. A sample of 942
candidates consisting of 15% of the population was selected using a proportionate random
sampling method. Lumen Ex Machina 4, 500 x 200 was used to analyze the data, while one
way ANOVA from Microsoft Excel Data Analysis Tools tested the hypotheses at a 0.05
significance level. Results showed that the mean reliability of the examinations was 79%, with
a standard deviation of 1.02. The mean item difficulty index was 0.48, with 156 (62.4%) items
within the acceptable threshold. The mean discrimination index was 0.32, with 238 (95.2%)
items showing average or above discrimination levels. NECO Technical Drawing had 996
distractors across 250 items, with a distractor efficiency of 76.4%. One item was found to be
faulty. Findings revealed no significant differences in reliability, item difficulty, discrimination
index, or distractor efficiency across the years studied. It was therefore recommended inter
alia that schools should train teachers to carry out item analysis, teachers should make use of
chief examiners' reports frequently to enable students to avoid pitfalls in subsequent
examinations and that chief examiners' reports should also cover multiple choice questions
since it does not currently cover that aspect.