This paper is a theory oriented research that seeks to generalise the peace
performance scenario of Middle East and North African nations, by examining
different conditions in which the states of the region win or fail. For this, it
scrutinises states’ performance in terms of three basic domains—ongoing
domestic and international conflict, societal safety and security, and the
militarisation—that are chosen from Global Peace Index (GPI) reports where
state-specific performance in every domain and all other relevant data are
contained. By applying cross-nation comparative method and different kinds of
statistical operations, the paper finds that lack of security is the core crisis of
this region. However, the best and highly progressive performers of the region
have good performance in conflict domain and have a favourable control over
the conditions of security. But due to their bad performance in the domain of
militarisation, they fall to be globally lagging in the GPI ranking. On the other
hand, in spite of the worst performance in security which is caused mainly by
their comparatively bad performance in conflict domain, the least and highly
deteriorative performers show a better performance in the domain of
militarization which implies that such countries have the potential to secure, for
themselves, a globally progressed ranking in GPI evaluation, if they can
continue the making of such progress in this domain