Logo Lanfrica
  • Accueil
  • Atlas
  • Analyses
  • Documentation
  • Sign in

© 2026 Lanfrica. Tous droits réservés. Tous les droits d'auteur des ressources affichées sur le site Web Lanfrica appartiennent aux détenteurs de droits d'auteur d'origine, sauf indication contraire explicite.

Cross-lingual Euphemism Detection Accuracy in Sequential XLM-R-Large Fine-tuning

Domaine:

natural language processing

Type de record:

paper
Créateur:
Ass
Éditeur:
Zenodo
Hôte:avatar
Euphemisms are culturally variable and often ambiguous, posing challenges for language models, especially in low-resource settings. This paper investigates how cross-lingual transfer via sequential fine-tuning affects euphemism detection across five languages: English, Spanish, Chinese, Turkish, and Yoruba. We compare sequential fine-tuning with monolingual and simultaneous fine-tuning using XLM-R and mBERT, analyzing how performance is shaped by language pairings, typological features, and pretraining coverage. Results show that sequential fine-tuning with a high-resource L1 improves L2 perfo Research goal: How does varying the fine-tuning order of languages in sequential fine-tuning of XLM-R-Large affect the accuracy and precision of cross-lingual euphemism detection, compared to random or typology-based ordering? Autonomous synthesis report generated by Assignee Research. Tribunal consensus score: 8.7/10. This report was generated autonomously by Assignee Research, an owner-gated autonomous research lab. The content synthesizes findings from peer-reviewed papers. Tribunal score: 8.7/10.

Visit

doi.org

Tasks

text classificationtransfer learning

Languages

Yoruba

Tags

varyingfine-tuningorderlanguagessequentialXLM-R-Largeaffectaccuracy

Licenses

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Internationalhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode

Similaires

Cross-lingual Euphemism Detection Performance in XLM-R-Large: Sequential vs. Simultaneous Fine-tuningCross-lingual euphemism detection inference efficiency in XLM-R-Large with sequential vs. simultaneous fine-tuningBatch Size Scaling Strategies in Sequential Fine-Tuning of XLM-R-Large for Cross-Lingual Euphemism DetectionSequential Fine-Tuning of XLM-R-Large for Low-Resource Euphemism DetectionXLM-R Fine-Tuning Strategies for Cross-Lingual Euphemism Detection: Throughput-Accuracy Trade-offsSequential Fine-Tuning with XLM-R for Cross-Lingual Euphemism Detection Across Varying Typological Distances

Cross-lingual Euphemism Detection Performance in XLM-R-Large: Sequential vs. Simultaneous Fine-tuning

Euphemisms are culturally variable and often ambiguous, posing challenges for language models, espec

Cross-lingual euphemism detection inference efficiency in XLM-R-Large with sequential vs. simultaneous fine-tuning

Euphemisms are culturally variable and often ambiguous, posing challenges for language models, espec

Batch Size Scaling Strategies in Sequential Fine-Tuning of XLM-R-Large for Cross-Lingual Euphemism Detection

Euphemisms are culturally variable and often ambiguous, posing challenges for language models, espec

Sequential Fine-Tuning of XLM-R-Large for Low-Resource Euphemism Detection

Euphemisms are culturally variable and often ambiguous, posing challenges for language models, espec

XLM-R Fine-Tuning Strategies for Cross-Lingual Euphemism Detection: Throughput-Accuracy Trade-offs

Euphemisms are culturally variable and often ambiguous, posing challenges for language models, espec

Sequential Fine-Tuning with XLM-R for Cross-Lingual Euphemism Detection Across Varying Typological Distances

Euphemisms are culturally variable and often ambiguous, posing challenges for language models, espec