Environmental education across Nigerian universities remains predominantly informational: students are told
about environmental problems and expected, on that basis alone, to develop the attitudes, knowledge, and
behaviours that address them. This paper argues that this model rests on an outdated and largely discredited
assumption — that environmental knowledge reliably produces pro-environmental behaviour — and proposes
an integrative alternative grounded in experiential, place-based, and critically reflective pedagogy. Drawing
on the theory of planned behaviour, Kolb’s experiential learning cycle, Orr’s ecological literacy and Grue-
newald’s critical pedagogy of place, Freire’s critical pedagogy, universal design for learning, Schwartz’s norm
activation model, and Gifford’s psychological barriers to pro-environmental action, this paper develops a
framework addressing three distinct but interlocking gaps in Nigerian environmental education: the absence
of experiential and inclusive pedagogy attentive to diverse learners and indigenous ecological knowledge, the
psychological and normative barriers that prevent environmental awareness from translating into behaviour,
and the disciplinary tendency to treat environmental education as content delivery rather than capacity-build-
ing for citizenship. The paper grounds its argument in confirmed empirical anchors including Kaiser, Wolf-
ing, and Fuhrer’s foundational theory of planned behaviour study, the New Ecological Paradigm scale, a
real University of Ibadan environmental awareness study, a genuine, if more cautious than commonly cited,
systematic review of environmental education outcomes for conservation, and a documented African social
work precedent for indigenous knowledge integration in environmental practice from Zimbabwe, published
in a journal indexed across AJOL, DOAJ, and Scopus. The paper advances six testable propositions concern-
ing experiential pedagogy, inclusive design, and normative barriers to pro-environmental behaviour among
Nigerian university students, and concludes with recommendations for restructuring environmental education
around experiential, inclusive, and psychologically realistic foundations.