Logo Lanfrica
  • Accueil
  • Atlas
  • Analyses
  • Documentation
  • Sign in

© 2026 Lanfrica. Tous droits réservés. Tous les droits d'auteur des ressources affichées sur le site Web Lanfrica appartiennent aux détenteurs de droits d'auteur d'origine, sauf indication contraire explicite.

Data for: Decisions, Deadlocks and Deadlines in Making South Africa's Constitution

Domaine:

peace and security

Type de record:

dataset
Créateur:
Ebr
Éditeur:
QuaEbr
Éditeur:
Qua
Hôte:avatar
This is an Annotation for Transparent… data project.

The annotated article can be viewed on the publisher's website.



South Africa’s 1996 constitution has been described as the birth certificate of a new, non-apartheid state. Following the Harare declaration in 1989, the process of ending apartheid accelerated, in which the writing of a new constitution played an important role. Throughout the process, there was gridlock involving the makeup of the constituent assembly and constitutional stipulations involving the death penalty, lockout clauses, the language of education, the appointment of judges, and other issues. In the 25 years since the adoption of the constitution, it has proven to be a robust bulwark against infighting and instability. There are several lessons from South Africa’s constitutive process. While the constitution is best understood within the context of South Africa’s history and the ANC’s resistance to apartheid, an essential aspect of the process was that many of the disputes were settled collectively in “package deals” and through novel deadlock breaking mechanisms.

Visit

doi.orgdata.qdr.syr.edu

Tags

LawFOS: LawSocial Sciencesconstitutionsconstitutional changenegotiation

Licenses

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessQualitative Data Repository Standard Access Conditionshttps://qdr.syr.edu/policies/qdr-standard-access-conditions