Logo Lanfrica

Data from: Developing the global potential of citizen science: assessing opportunities that benefit people, society and the environment in East Africa

Domaine:

environment and energy

Type de record:

dataset
Créateur:
Pocock, Michael J. O.Roy, Helen E.August, TomKuria, Anthony
Éditeur:
Zenodo
Hôte:avatar
1. Citizen science is gaining increasing prominence as a tool for science and engagement but has little visibility in many developing countries, despite being a potentially valuable tool for sustainable development. 2. We undertook a collaborative prioritization process with experts in conservation and the environment to assess the potential of environmental citizen science in East Africa including its opportunities, benefits and barriers. This provided principles that are applicable across developing countries, particularly for large-scale citizen science. 3. We found that there was great potential for citizen science to add to our scientific knowledge of natural resources and biodiversity trends. Many of the important benefits of citizen science were for people, as well as the environment directly. Major barriers to citizen science were mostly social and institutional, although projects should also consider access to suitable technology and language barriers. 4. Policy implications. Citizen science can provide data to support decision-making and reporting against international targets. Participation can provide societal benefits, informing and empowering people, thus supporting the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals. In developing countries there needs to be innovation to develop culturally-relevant citizen science benefitting participants and end-users. This should be supported through regional networks of stakeholders for sharing best practice.
Ranking of opportunities for, benefits of and barriers to environmental citizen science in East Africa, based on scores given by workshop participants
Scores given by workshop participants to their top-ranked items in the lists of opportunities for, benefits of and barriers to environmental citizen science in East Africa. Participants collaboratively defined these items within each category (opportunties, benefits and barriers) and then anonymously scored these items, giving a score of three, two and one to their top-, second- and third-ranked priorities respectively in each category, based on the questions in Table 1 in the main text of ther associated paper. 'Sum' and 'count' is the sum and count of these scores. Items in each category are arranged by the sum of scores. Note that the scores were used to rank relative important, not to distinguish unimportant items, because all items on the list were considered to have importance, even if they were not deemed to be a high priority.
data for dryad.csv