Pollinators are important drivers of floral divergence and speciation in
plants. Here we investigate the effects of floral trait variation and
trait matching on pollen receipt in two different plant species, each
visited by different functional pollinator types across their ranges.
Using single visits by pollinators to flowers in populations with
experimentally increased variance in floral morphology, we demonstrate
that distinct functional groups of pollinators affect pollen movement
differently through their interactions with floral trait variation. This
study provides details of how the mechanical fit between floral and
pollinator morphology may drive the evolution of floral traits through its
effects on pollen deposition both within and between populations with
contrasting pollinators. We used single-visit experiments to understand the relationship
between a component of female fitness (pollen receipt) and flower
morphology, in association with insects that vary in their morphological
traits that affect pollination. Insect
morphology was collected by capture with a butterfly net and measurements
were taken with a steel ruler or callipers Floral
morphology was collected by cutting bolting inflorescences at the base
from the field, and floral traits were measured to the nearest millimetre
using a steel ruler or digital set of callipers
Inflorescences containing flowers with receptive stigmas were
used to conduct single visits where virgin flowers were exposed to
pollinators and pollinators were allowed to visit a flower only once.
After this event, the stigmas were removed and embedded in fuchsin gel
from which the pollen grains were counted. With Nerine humilis that have
large pollen grains, pollen was counted directly on the stigma after a
single visit in the same afternoon under a disection
microscope. # Data from: Pollinator and flower morphology interact to influence pollen
receipt This file READ_ME_Performance_Surfaces.txt was generated on
30/03/2024 ## GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Title of Dataset: Pollinator and
flower morphology interact to influence pollen receipt 2. Author
Information: 3. Date of data collection: March and April 2015 to 2024 4.
Field locations of data collection: Main experimental sites: A. Barrydale,
Western Cape, South Africa (-33.935997°S, 20.679453°E) B. Swartberg,
Western Cape, South Africa (-33.362594°S, 22.068132°E) C. Nuwekloof Pass,
Baviaanskloof, Eastern Cape, South africa (-33.511291°S, 23.642786°E) D.
Swellendam, Western Cape, South Africa (-34.184574°S, 20.291919°E) 5.
Funding sources: ## DATA AND FILE OVERVIEW ### 1. Description of dataset
Our dataset investigates the interaction between flower and pollinator
morphology in influencing pollen receipt surfaces in two geophytes, Nerine
humilis and Tritoniopsis revoluta. Data in these files have primarily been
collected from our four field sites that represented a main
'native' site of each of the taxa, we also introduced variation
from close populations in order to increased variance in each population.
This allowed us to more easily determine the form and strength of
selection. ### 2. File list File 1 Name:1. Proboscis_Measurements.csv
Description: Proboscis measurements of all insects from our experimental
populations. File 2 Name:2. Plant_Trait_Variation.csv Description: Floral
trait measurements associated with the standing variation and increased
variation for each species, from each population. File 3 Name:3.
Swellendam_Full_Datasetcsv Description: Full dataset associated with
single visits for the short style locality, Swellendam. This dataset was
specifically used to generate performance surfaces and selection
coefficients for the short style Nerine humilis. File 4 Name:4.
Baviaanskloof_Full_Dataset.csv Description: Full dataset associated with
single visits for the long style locality, Baviaanskloof. This dataset was
specifically used to generate performance surfaces and selection
coefficients for the long style Nerine humilis. File 5 Name:5.
Barrydale_Full_Dataset.csv Description: Full dataset associated with
single visits for the long tube locality, Barrydale. This dataset was
specifically used to generate performance surfaces and selection
coefficients for the long tubed Tritoniopsis revoluta. File 6 Name:6.
Swartberg_Full_Dataset.csv Description: Full dataset associated with
single visits for the short tubed locality, Swartberg. This dataset was
specifically used to generate performance surfaces and selection
coefficients for the short tubed Tritoniopsis revoluta. File 7 Name:6.
Swartberg_Full_DatasetR60.csv Description: Full dataset associated with
single visits for the short tubed locality, Swartberg. This dataset was
specifically used to generate selection coefficients for short proboscid
insects associated with the short tubed Tritoniopsis revoluta. We removed
one outlier from this particular dataset which gave a significant linear
coefficient when present (see Figure 2F), as in the
"Swartberg_Full_Dataset.csv". This dataset is the same as file
6, but without row 60. ### 3. Methodological information (A) Morphological
data: Files 1 and 2 containing raw data associated with calculating
descriptive statistics, specifically means and standard deviations. File 1
is associated with proboscis measurements and File 2 contains data
associated with local and increased variation at our experimental
localities. (B) Performance surfaces and coefficients Files 3-7 contains
data associated with single visits based on native and increased variance.
This raw data was used to generate pollen receipt surfaces and calculate
selection coefficients. ## DATA SPECIFIC INFORMATION FOR EACH FILE ###
FILE: 1. Proboscis_Measurements.csv (A) Number of variables: 6 (B) Number
of rows: 62 (including headers) (C) Variable list: * Date: Date insect was
caught. * Pollinator: Pollinator species * Locality: Locality where caught
* Caught visiting: Flower pollinator was caught on * Extended proboscis
length (mm): The extended proboscis length measurement of each insect *
Functional Body Length (mm): Body length measurement associated with
affecting pollination (D) Missing data codes: 37 cells under
"Functional Body Length (mm)" starting from lines 29 to 65 (E)
Abbreviations used: None (F) Other relevant information: None ### FILE: 2.
Plant_Trait_Variation.csv (A) Number of variables: 4 (B) Number of rows:
441 (including headers) (C) Variable list: * Species: Taxon * Locality:
Locality of taxon sampled * Natural Variation: Natural variation
associated with the trait collected for each taxon * Extended Variation:
Increased variation associated with the trait collected for each taxon.
(D) Missing data codes: None (E) Abbreviations used: None (F) Other
relevant information: Data is only missing because of unequal sampling
between different taxa for natural versus extended variation columns ###
FILE: 3. Swellendam_Full_Dataset.csv (A) Number of variables: 4 (B) Number
of rows: 146 (including headers) (C) Variable list: * Source: Source of
trait variation used in single visit experiment * Pollinator: Pollinator
taxon visiting flower * Style length (mm): Style length of flower used in
single visit experiment * Pollen: Pollen grains deposited per single visit
(D) Missing data codes: None (E) Abbreviations used: None (F) Other
relevant information: None ### FILE: 4. Baviaanskloof_Full_Dataset.csv (A)
Number of variables: 4 (B) Number of rows: 70 (including headers) (C)
Variable list: * Source: Source of trait variation used in single visit
experiment * Pollinator_species: Pollinator taxon visiting flower * Style
length (mm): Style length of flower used in single visit experiment *
Pollen: Pollen grains deposited per single visit (D) Missing data codes:
None (E) Abbreviations used: None (F) Other relevant information: None ###
FILE: 5. Barrydale_Full_Dataset.csv (A) Number of columns : 5 (B) Number
of rows: 55 (including headers) (C) Variable list: *
Functional_pollinator_type:Describes the functional group of pollinators
associated with a single visit * pollinator: Pollinator species *
tube_length_(mm): Tube length of flower used in single visit * pollen:
number of pollen grains recorded associated with single visit event *
visitor: code for functional pollinator group used in "by"
command for generalized additive models (D) Missing data codes: None (E)
Abbreviations used: \[SPI] - Short probscid insect \[LTF] - Long proboscid
fly (F) Other relevant information: visitor code is directly linked to
functional pollinator groups defined in (E) directly above ### FILE: 6.
Swartberg_Full_Dataset.csv (A) Number of columns : 5 (B) Number of rows:
100 (including headers) (C) Variable list: *
Functional_pollinator_type:Describes the functional group of pollinators
associated with a single visit * Pollinator: Pollinator species *
tube_length_(mm): Tube length of flower used in single visit * pollen:
number of pollen grains recorded associated with single visit event *
visitor: code for functional pollinator group used in "by"
command for generalized additive models (D) Missing data codes: None (E)
Abbreviations used: \[LTF] - Long proboscid fly \[SPI] - Short probscid
insect (F) Other relevant information: visitor code is directly linked to
functional pollinator groups defined in (E) directly above ### FILE: 7.
Swartberg_Full_DatasetR60.csv (A) Number of columns: 5 (B) Number of rows:
99 (including headers) (C) Variable list: * Functional_pollinator_type:
Describes the functional group of pollinators associated with a single
visit * Pollinator: Pollinator species * tube_length_(mm): Tube length of
flower used in single visit * pollen: number of pollen grains recorded
associated with single visit event * visitor: code for functional
pollinator group used in "by" command for generalized additive
models (D) Missing data codes: None (E) Abbreviations used: \[LTF] - Long
proboscid fly \[SPI] - Short probscid insect (F) Other relevant
information: visitor code is directly linked to functional pollinator
groups defined in (E) directly above. Important! Row 60 was removed in
this dataset associated with the above dataset
"Swartberg_Full_Dataset.csv" because of an outlier that gave a
significant postive linear relationship.