Debating the implications of the Pretoria Agreement for Ethiopia: countering attempts to silence alternative voices
Domaine:
peace and securityType de record:
paper
Créateur:
FanYon
Éditeur:
Rev
Hôte:
SUMMARY
Following an earlier piece by the authors debating the importance of the Pretoria Agreement (or Cessation of Hostilities Agreement) concluded in November 2022, this piece sets out their formal response to and rebuttal of blog comments received on Roape.net (Gebrehiwot et al. 2023), and also of comments in a debate piece by J. Abbink (2023) published in this issue of the Review of African Political Economy (ROAPE). The authors here contest the views put forward as lacking engagement with their arguments and mischaracterising their views.
Similaires
Debating the Data: Socio-Economic Marginalization of Tigray in Old Ethiopia?Modelling the potential alternative pathways for the transition to clean cooking for the Residential sector in EthiopiaEarly Attempts at Aquaculture in Malawi and Implications for Future ProjectsVoices in the silence : narratives of disadvantage, social context and school mathematics in post-apartheid South AfricaAn alternative approach to measuring the welfare implications of input subsidies: Evidence from MalawiTHE NEED FOR INTERPRETER SERVICES AND ALTERNATIVE COMMUNICATION STRATEGIES IN PHYSIOTHERAPY DEPARTMENTS TERTIARY PUBLIC HOSPITALS IN PRETORIA, SOUTH AFRICA