Defamation on facebook: Isparta V Richter 2013 6 SA 529 (GP)
Type de record:
paper
Créateur:
A RM S
Éditeur:
Aca
Hôte:
Litigation involving social media is still very new in South Africa and only a few reported cases can be found. In this case discussion, a brief overview is given of the few cases already reported, but in the main the case of Isparta v Richter 2013 6 SA 4529 (GP) is discussed. In this case a South African court for the first time awarded damages to the plaintiff for defamatory comments made on Facebook. The questions that confronted the judge were whether the alleged defamatory statements did indeed relate to the plaintiff and whether the comments, individually or collectively, could be considered defamatory. The issue whether the "tagging" of another user of Facebook makes that user liable for the defamatory comments of the tagger is also addressed in the case. The case discussion concludes with a reference to other issues that could play a role in litigation involving Facebook, namely the Electronic Communications and Transactions Act 25 of 2002 and foreign law.
Similaires
Varieties of Democracy v.6Dept-of-Comp-Sci-University-of-Ghana/tweet-sentiment-extraction-cmsm-gp-6Mohamed-gp/algeria_69_wilayasPolitics Unusual? Facebook and Political Campaigning during the 2013 Harmonised Elections in ZimbabweThe Role of the Judiciary to Construct a Concise and Balanced Judgment on the Right to Life vis-à-vis Economic Life of Persons: Some Thoughts on Mohamed v President of the Republic of South Africa 2020 (7) BCLR 865 (GP) and De Beer v Minister of Co-operative Governance and Traditional Affairs 2020 (11) BCLR 1349 (GP)Facebook Use in the 2011 and 2013 Revolts in Egypt: The New Media Environment