Logo Lanfrica
  • Accueil
  • Atlas
  • Analyses
  • Documentation
  • Sign in

© 2026 Lanfrica. Tous droits réservés. Tous les droits d'auteur des ressources affichées sur le site Web Lanfrica appartiennent aux détenteurs de droits d'auteur d'origine, sauf indication contraire explicite.

Does socio-economic status explain the differentials in malaria parasite prevalence? Evidence from The Gambia

Domaine:

healthcaresocioeconomic
Créateur:
SonJaiJafJar
Éditeur:
Col
Hôte:avatar
Malaria is commonly associated with poverty. Macro-level estimates show strong links between malaria and poverty, and increasing evidence suggests that the causal link between malaria and poverty runs in both directions. However, micro-level (household and population) analyses on the linkages between malaria and poverty have often produced mixed results. The Gambia Malaria Indicator Survey (MIS) 2010/11 was carried out between November 2010 and January 2011. Laboratory-confirmed malaria and wealth quintiles were used to assess the association of socio-economic status and malaria infection in children and the general population. Simple and multiple logistic regressions and survey data analysis procedures, including linearized standard errors to account for cluster sampling and unequal selection probabilities were applied. Children (six to 59 months) from the second, third, fourth and richest quintiles were significantly less likely to have malaria compared to children from the poorest quintiles. Children (five to 14 years) from the fourth and richest quintiles were also significantly less likely to have malaria compared to those from the poorest quintiles. The malaria burden has shifted from the under-five children (six to 59 months) to children aged five to 14 years. Malaria prevalence was significantly higher in the Central River Region compared to the Upper River Region; and males bear the malaria brunt more than females. Children (six to 59 months) and children (five to 14 years) living in houses with poor walls, floors, roofs and windows were significant associated with higher prevalence of malaria. However, in the general population, only poor wall housing materials were associated with higher prevalence of malaria. Investments in strategies that address socio-economic disparities and improvements in the quality of housing could, in the long term, significantly reduce the malaria burden in the poorest communities.

Visit

doi.orgacademiccommons.columbia.edu

Tags

Housing and healthMalaria--Economic aspectsEnvironmental health

Similaires

HIV/AIDS Sero‐prevalence and Socio‐economic Status: Evidence from UgandaKwabenaAsabere/MAPPING-MALARIA-PREVALENCE-IN-THE-GAMBIACan poverty status explain obesity in developing countries? Evidence from GhanaSocio-economic status of people after covid-19: evidence from a bourgeoning municipality.Does rainfall variability explain low uptake of agricultural credit? Evidence from EthiopiaThe Gendered [Socio-]Economic Determinants of Political Behavior: Evidence from Nigeria

HIV/AIDS Sero‐prevalence and Socio‐economic Status: Evidence from Uganda

Abstract Although Uganda reported large reductions in HIV/AIDS prevalence during the 1990s, recen

KwabenaAsabere/MAPPING-MALARIA-PREVALENCE-IN-THE-GAMBIA

# **Malaria Prevalence Mapping in The Gambia** ## **Project Overview** This project investigates *

Can poverty status explain obesity in developing countries? Evidence from Ghana

Abstract The relationship between socioeconomic status and obesity remains inconclusive in both dev

Socio-economic status of people after covid-19: evidence from a bourgeoning municipality.

The outbreak of Covid-19 came as a bolt from the bloom and sparked fears in everyone. Various interv

Does rainfall variability explain low uptake of agricultural credit? Evidence from Ethiopia

Abstract Credit markets are key instruments by which liquidity-constrained smallholder farmers may

The Gendered [Socio-]Economic Determinants of Political Behavior: Evidence from Nigeria

The project sets out to collect original data on, and identify the individual level effects of gende