Logo Lanfrica
  • Accueil
  • Atlas
  • Analyses
  • Documentation
  • Sign in

© 2026 Lanfrica. Tous droits réservés. Tous les droits d'auteur des ressources affichées sur le site Web Lanfrica appartiennent aux détenteurs de droits d'auteur d'origine, sauf indication contraire explicite.

Food preferences determine human–elephant coexistence in African woodlands

Domaine:

agricultureenvironment and energy
Créateur:
MarAlfRam
Éditeur:
Cam
Hôte:
Abstract Human–elephant coexistence remains a major conservation and livelihood challenge across elephant Loxodonta africana range in Africa. This study investigates the extent of elephant crop damage on 66 farms in the Selous–Niassa corridor (Tanzania), to search for potential management solutions to this problem. We found that the relative abundance of highly preferred crops (area covered by preferred crops divided by the total area of each farm) was by far the most important factor determining crop damage by elephants. Eighteen crop types were ranked according to their preference by elephants. Sweet potatoes, bananas, peanuts, onions, pumpkins and maize were the most preferred crops, with maize the most common crop among those highly preferred. On average elephants damaged 25.7% of the cultivated farmland they entered. A beta regression model suggests that a reduction in the cultivation of preferred crops from 75 to 25% of the farmland area decreases elephant crop damage by 64%. Water availability (distance to the nearest waterhole) and the presence of private investors (mostly hunting tourism companies) were of lower importance in determining elephant crop damage. Thus, damage by elephants increased with shorter distances to waterholes and decreased in areas with private investors. However, further studies are required, particularly of the perceived costs and benefits of elephants to local communities. Farm aggregation and the use of non-preferred crops that also require less water would potentially reduce elephant damage but would be a major lifestyle change for some local communities.

Visit

doi.org

Licenses

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Similaires

A landscape framework for human‐elephant coexistenceLet Us Give Voice to Local Farmers: Preferences for Farm-Based Strategies to Enhance Human–Elephant Coexistence in AfricaExploring Routes to Coexistence: Developing and Testing a Human–Elephant Conflict-Management Framework for African Elephant-Range CountriesLiving with Giants: Implications of elephant habitat choice on human-elephant conflict and coexistenceAn experimental game to examine pastoralists' preferences for human–lion coexistence strategiesUsing a multiscale lidar approach to determine variation in canopy structure from African forest elephant trails

A landscape framework for human‐elephant coexistence

Abstract Forest elephant crop depredation incidents (CDIs) threaten both village

Let Us Give Voice to Local Farmers: Preferences for Farm-Based Strategies to Enhance Human–Elephant Coexistence in Africa

Local communities surrounding wildlife corridors and natural reserves often face challenges related

Exploring Routes to Coexistence: Developing and Testing a Human–Elephant Conflict-Management Framework for African Elephant-Range Countries

Creating a future for elephants and people is a highly complex and dynamic challenge, involving soci

Living with Giants: Implications of elephant habitat choice on human-elephant conflict and coexistence

We are currently in the middle of a global environmental crisis, with a million species at risk of e

An experimental game to examine pastoralists' preferences for human–lion coexistence strategies

Abstract Reconciling conflicts between wildlife conservation and other human activities is a

Using a multiscale lidar approach to determine variation in canopy structure from African forest elephant trails

ABSTRACT Recently classified as a unique species by the IUCN, A