Logo Lanfrica
  • Accueil
  • Atlas
  • Analyses
  • Documentation
  • Sign in

© 2026 Lanfrica. Tous droits réservés. Tous les droits d'auteur des ressources affichées sur le site Web Lanfrica appartiennent aux détenteurs de droits d'auteur d'origine, sauf indication contraire explicite.

From Prebendal State to Fragile State

Domaine:

peace and security

Type de record:

paper
Créateur:
AgaJoh
Éditeur:
Zenodo
Hôte:avatar
This article investigates whether the postcolonial political trajectory of Nigeria, from independence in 1960 to the present, constitutes a structurally reproduced cycle of institutional dysfunction or a contested, non-linear process in which genuine democratic progress coexists with persistent fragility. The dominant optimistic reading foregrounds peaceful power transfers, civil society resilience, and recent economic reforms. Against that reading, this article advances the argument that a specific structural mechanism, termed the Performative Democracy Trap (PDT), explains why formal democratic institutions in Nigeria fail to generate the accountability outcomes that democratic theory predicts. The PDT is defined as an equilibrium condition in which formal democratic procedures are maintained with sufficient regularity to generate international legitimacy and associated financing, while those same procedures are colonised by prebendal elite networks that evacuate their substantive accountability content. The article distinguishes the PDT from existing frameworks, namely competitive authoritarianism (Levitsky & Way, 2002, 2010), delegative democracy (O'Donnell, 1994), and hybrid regimes (Diamond, 2002), and specifies the observable implications by which it can be tested and, in principle, falsified. The argument is constructed through a structured process-tracing methodology across three temporal phases, covering 1960 to 1999, 1999 to 2026, and a 2026 to 2030 projection, and draws on the prebendal framework of Joseph (1987), the neopatrimonial model of Bratton and Van de Walle (1997), and the underutilised strategic forecast of Kinnan et al. (2011). The article takes counterarguments seriously and examines evidence of democratic consolidation, sub-national governance improvement, civil society mobilisation, and macroeconomic reform. It concludes that these positive developments, although analytically significant, remain structurally insufficient to interrupt the PDT without simultaneous transformation across multiple interdependent institutional domains. The July 2025 classification of Nigeria as a Fragile and Conflict-Affected State by the IMF and the World Bank provides the primary empirical anchor for the prognostic argument.

Visit

doi.org

Tags

prebendalismneopatrimonialismstate fragilitydemocratic erosionPerformative Democracy Trapresource curseFourth Republicinstitutional failurecascading failureprocess tracing

Licenses

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Internationalhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode