Demand for insurance can be driven by high risk aversion or high risk. That means risk-avoidant or risk-averse
individuals have a high probability of purchasing crop insurance to protect against income loss caused by averse
events such as drought, excessive rainfall, floods, windstorms, uncontrollable pests and diseases, and other production
risks that are beyond farmers' control (Act of God). However, there are factors that affect individual risk preference
that are important to understand in order to increase demand for crop insurance. A number of studies have been
conducted to investigate factors affect individual farmers risk preference with the majority of researchers focusing on
the social economic domain such as age, sex, income, farming size, and experience of farming to assess if those factors
affect an individual's risk aversion. In filling that void, a risk experiment study understands the risk aversion of maize
smallholder farmers and explore new factors that affect individual risk aversion was sought.The paper applies the
Barsky–Juster–Kimball–Shapiro (BJKS1997) hypothetical income-gamble to 360 maize farmers in Kongwa District to
classify individual risk preferences. A logistic regression then links risk aversion (binary) to seed type, farming purpose,
perceived climate risk and expected monetary loss, controlling for demographic variables. Results show 83 % of farmers
are risk-averse; farming purpose, high perceived climate risk and expected income loss significantly raise the odds of
risk aversion, whereas seed type does not. The authors conclude that identifying these drivers can help insurers target
products and raise crop-insurance uptake. The policy implication of this finding is about high probability of smallholder
farmers in Tanzania to buy crop insurance as a resilience strategy as risk averse have high odd of being insured.