The paper presents an iterative,
model-free Quality-by-Control
(QbC) framework as a strategic enabler for crystallization process
development, facilitating both the selection of process analytical
technology (PAT) tools and the implementation of robust control strategies.
The framework employs a mechanism-oriented decision-making approach
to guide the choice between Direct Nucleation Control (DNC), Supersaturation
Control (SSC), or a hybrid of the two, based on the relative significance
of growth and agglomeration phenomena. A practical rule of thumb is
proposed for selecting appropriate control variables, leveraging inline
data quality and temperature trajectory insights. The framework is
demonstrated using a case study involving a commercial active pharmaceutical
ingredient (API), with the objective of enhancing crystallinity and
reducing agglomeration in the final product. Offline tools such as
high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and differential scanning
calorimetry (DSC) are used to track crystallinity changes in systems
with both amorphous and crystalline content. Factorial experimental
design analyses revealed key operational parameters that influenced
process performance. Unseeded crystallization resulted in encrustation
and poor crystallinity, while high supersaturation with slower cooling
and lower seed loading produced large needlelike crystals. Increasing
seed loading and applying slower cooling rates significantly improved
product crystallinity. Guided by the QbC framework and implemented
through turbidity-based DNC (TDNC), the process demonstrated significant
improvements in batch time, crystallinity, agglomeration control,
and robustness against seed variabilityoutperforming traditional
approaches. This work highlights the effectiveness of the proposed
framework in enabling informed, rapid design of enhanced and resilient
crystallization processes.